Literature DB >> 20355239

Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Yik Hong Ho1, Mohamed Ahmed Tawfik Ashour.   

Abstract

Colorectal anastomotic leak remains one of the most feared post-operative complications, particularly after anterior resection of the rectum with, the shift from abdomino-peritoneal resections to total mesorectal excision and primary anastomosis. The literature fails to demonstrate superiority of stapled over hand-sewn techniques in colorectal anastomosis, regardless of the level of anastomosis, although a high stricture rate was noted in the former technique. Thus, improvements in safety aspects of anastomosis and alternatives to hand-sewn and stapled techniques are being sought. Here, we review alternative anastomotic techniques used to fashion bowel anastomosis. Compression anastomosis using compression anastomotic clips, endoluminal compression anastomotic rings, AKA-2, biofragmental anastomotic rings, or Magnamosis all involve the concept of creating a sutureless end-to-end anastomosis by compressing two bowel ends together, leading to a simultaneous necrosis and healing process that joins the two lumens. Staple line reinforcement is a new approach that reduce the drawbacks of staplers used in colorectal practice, i.e. leakage, bleeding, misfiring, and inadequate tissue approximation. Various non-absorbable, semi or fully absorbable materials are now available. Two other techniques can provide alternative anastomotic support to the suture line: a colorectal drain and a polyester stent, which can be utilized in ultra-low rectal excision and can negate the formation of a defunctioning stoma. Doxycycline coated sutures have been used to overcome the post-operative weakness in anastomosis secondary to rapid matrix degradation mediated by matrix metalloproteinase. Another novel technique, the electric welding system, showed promising results in construction of a safe, neat, smooth sutureless bowel anastomosis. Various anastomotic techniques have been shown to be comparable to the standard techniques of suturing and stapling. However, most of these alternatives need to be accepted and optimized for future use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20355239      PMCID: PMC2848369          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  89 in total

1.  Laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  E H Phillips; M Franklin; B J Carroll; M J Fallas; R Ramos; D Rosenthal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid resection.

Authors:  D L Fowler; S A White
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

4.  New device for biofragmentable anastomotic ring in low anterior resection.

Authors:  T C Chen; K C Ding; M J Yang; C P Chang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: differences between small and large bowel.

Authors:  M F Martens; T Hendriks
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Small bowel anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  R Gullichsen; J Ovaska; A Rantala; T Havia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The BAR Investigational Group.

Authors:  M P Bubrick; M L Corman; C J Cahill; T G Hardy; F C Nance; C H Shatney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Murphy's Button revisited. Clinical experience with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring.

Authors:  K A Forde; A J McLarty; J Tsai; K Ghalili; H M Delany
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  N D Karanjia; A P Corder; P Bearn; R J Heald
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  T E Pakkastie; P E Luukkonen; H J Järvinen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994-05
View more
  29 in total

1.  A highly elastic and adhesive gelatin tissue sealant for gastrointestinal surgery and colon anastomosis.

Authors:  Tony Vuocolo; Roger Haddad; Glenn A Edwards; Russell E Lyons; Nancy E Liyou; Jerome A Werkmeister; John A M Ramshaw; Christopher M Elvin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Anatomy of the lateral ligaments of the rectum: a controversial point of view.

Authors:  Guo-Jun Wang; Chun-Fang Gao; Dong Wei; Cun Wang; Wen-Jian Meng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The effects of tacrolimus on colonic anastomotic healing in rats.

Authors:  D Raptis; I Mantzoros; M G Pramateftakis; K Despoudi; T Zaraboukas; G Koliakos; I Kanellos; Ch Lazarides
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Autobuttressing of colorectal anastomoses using a mesenteric flap.

Authors:  H M Mohan; D C Winter
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-08-27

5.  Endoscopic fixation of the rectum for rectal prolapse: a feasibility and survival experimental study.

Authors:  Jeffrey Milsom; Koiana Trencheva; Raghava Pavoor; Joseph Dirocco; Parul J Shukla; Junichiro Kawamura; Toyooki Sonoda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Richard Betzold; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

Review 7.  A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R Tabola; R Cirocchi; A Fingerhut; A Arezzo; J Randolph; V Grassi; G A Binda; V D'Andrea; I Abraha; G Popivanov; S Di Saverio; A Zbar
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Effect of omiganan on colonic anastomosis healing in a rat model of peritonitis.

Authors:  Teresa Lorenzi; Maria Michela Cappelletti Trombettoni; Roberto Ghiselli; Francesca Paolinelli; Rosaria Gesuita; Oscar Cirioni; Mauro Provinciali; Wojciech Kamysz; Elzbieta Kamysz; Cristiano Piangatelli; Mario Castellucci; Mario Guerrieri; Manrico Morroni
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Colorectal anastomosis facilitated by the use of the LigaSure(®) sealing device: comparative study in an animal model.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-De Pedro; Carlos Moreno-Sanz; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Jose María Tenías-Burillo; Cristina Alhambra-Rodríguez De Guzmán
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Integrated approach to colorectal anastomotic leakage: Communication, infection and healing disturbances.

Authors:  Cloë L Sparreboom; Zhou-Qiao Wu; Jia-Fu Ji; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.