Literature DB >> 8424705

Murphy's Button revisited. Clinical experience with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring.

K A Forde1, A J McLarty, J Tsai, K Ghalili, H M Delany.   

Abstract

Use of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) was attempted in 33 patients at two New York City institutions and employed in 31 instances. Anastomoses performed were end-to-end enterocolic (n = 15), colocolic (n = 15), and side-to-side colocolic (n = 1). Patients ranged in age from 27 to 86 years, with the following diagnoses: primary colon cancer, 15; sessile adenoma, four; colostomy, five; diverticulosis, two; metastatic cancer with obstruction, multiple polyposis, perforated appendiceal mass, malignant carcinoid of appendix, intussuscepting right colon mass, one each. In two instances use of the device was aborted because of concern with the blood supply to the bowel wall in one and tissue edema in another. The average duration of postoperative ileus was 4.7 days. Two patients were subsequently treated for small bowel obstruction thought unrelated to use of the anastomotic device. There were no deaths and no evidence of stricture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424705      PMCID: PMC1242737          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199301000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery. Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M L Corman; E D Prager; T G Hardy; M P Bubrick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  A new technique for sutureless intestinal anastomosis. A prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  D L Dyess; P W Curreri; J J Ferrara
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring: comparative efficacy studies in dogs.

Authors:  J W Maney; A R Katz; L K Li; W G Pace; T G Hardy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  The experimental basis of intestinal suturing. Effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Intestinal suturing. Review of the experimental foundations for traditional doctrines.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Development of intestinal anastomotic devices.

Authors:  M M Ravitch
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. An experimental study.

Authors:  T G Hardy; W G Pace; J W Maney; A R Katz; A L Kaganov
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Initial clinical experience with a biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis.

Authors:  T G Hardy; P S Aguilar; W R Stewart; A R Katz; J W Maney; J T Costanzo; W G Pace
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Prospective, randomized trial of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The BAR Investigational Group.

Authors:  M P Bubrick; M L Corman; C J Cahill; T G Hardy; F C Nance; C H Shatney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

  9 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review.

Authors:  A P Zbar; Y Nir; A Weizman; M Rabau; A Senagore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Yik Hong Ho; Mohamed Ahmed Tawfik Ashour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Biofragmentable anastomosis ring for laparoscopic bowel surgery.

Authors:  J M Sackier; G Jessup; H Krenz; W Allen; F Ahari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A A P Slesser; G Pellino; O Shariq; D Cocker; C Kontovounisios; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  End-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a novel biodegradable stent for laparoscopic colonic surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Mingyu Chen; Jiasheng Cao; Diyu Huang; Bin Zhang; Long Pan; Zhongtao Zhang; Zhenjun Wang; Yingjiang Ye; Dianrong Xiu; Dechuan Li; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Sutureless anastomosis using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring.

Authors:  F Konishi; Y Saito; H Ugajin; M Okada; H Kashiwagi; T Sato; K Kanazawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 7.  Innovative approaches for induction of gastrointestinal anastomotic healing: an update on experimental and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Stefan Reischl; Dirk Wilhelm; Helmut Friess; Philipp-Alexander Neumann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.445

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.