OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of elective colorectal operations, to identify factors that influence the anastomotic leak rate, and to assess the value of a covering colostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECT: 134 consecutive patients undergoing elective resection for a neoplasm (125 carcinomas and 10 villous adenomas) of the colon and rectum. INTERVENTIONS: 135 operations (one for a recurrence in the anastomotic line). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Two patients died (1%) and there were 29 complications (21%); 16 patients developed clinical anastomotic leaks (12%) and 3 patients symptomatic strictures (2%). One patient who developed a leak died and 11 of the 16 (69%) were re-operated on. The rest settled spontaneously. The only significant risk factor associated with leakage was distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (all 16 leaks were within 7 cm, compared with 44/118 without leaks, p < 0.001). Four patients who developed leaks were left with permanent colostomies. Protecting stomas had no significant influence, despite the fact that only 1 of those that developed leaks had a colostomy compared with 9/109 that did not. CONCLUSION: Prospective controlled studies are needed to establish the true value of a covering colostomy after low colorectal anastomosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of elective colorectal operations, to identify factors that influence the anastomotic leak rate, and to assess the value of a covering colostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECT: 134 consecutive patients undergoing elective resection for a neoplasm (125 carcinomas and 10 villous adenomas) of the colon and rectum. INTERVENTIONS: 135 operations (one for a recurrence in the anastomotic line). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Two patients died (1%) and there were 29 complications (21%); 16 patients developed clinical anastomotic leaks (12%) and 3 patients symptomatic strictures (2%). One patient who developed a leak died and 11 of the 16 (69%) were re-operated on. The rest settled spontaneously. The only significant risk factor associated with leakage was distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (all 16 leaks were within 7 cm, compared with 44/118 without leaks, p < 0.001). Four patients who developed leaks were left with permanent colostomies. Protecting stomas had no significant influence, despite the fact that only 1 of those that developed leaks had a colostomy compared with 9/109 that did not. CONCLUSION: Prospective controlled studies are needed to establish the true value of a covering colostomy after low colorectal anastomosis.
Authors: Angela Fischer; Ignazio Tarantino; René Warschkow; Jochen Lange; Andreas Zerz; Franc H Hetzer Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: B Lefebure; J J Tuech; V Bridoux; B Costaglioli; M Scotte; P Teniere; F Michot Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2007-09-02 Impact factor: 2.571