Literature DB >> 28132113

A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses.

R Tabola1, R Cirocchi2, A Fingerhut3, A Arezzo4, J Randolph5, V Grassi6, G A Binda7, V D'Andrea8, I Abraha9, G Popivanov10, S Di Saverio11, A Zbar12,13.   

Abstract

Anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery can be a devastating adverse event. The ideal stapling device should be capable of rapid creation of an anastomosis with serosal apposition without the persistence of a foreign body or a foreign body reaction which potentially contribute to early anastomotic dehiscence or late anastomotic stricture. A systematic review was performed examining available data on controlled randomized and non-randomized trials assessing the NiTi compression anastomosis ring-(NiTi CAR™) (NiTi Solutions, Netanyah Israel) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. A protocol for this meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016050934). The initial search yielded 45 potentially relevant articles. After screening titles and abstracts for relevance and assessment for eligibility, 39 of these articles were eventually excluded leaving 6 studies for analysis in the review. Regarding the primary outcome measure, the overall anastomotic leak rate was 2.2% (5/230) in the compression anastomosis group compared with 3% (10/335) in the conventional anastomosis group; this difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.25-2.24; participants = 565; studies = 6; I 2 = 0%). There were no statistically significant differences between compression and conventional anastomoses in any of the secondary outcomes. This review was unable to demonstrate any statistically significant differences in favor of the compression anastomosis technique over conventional manual or stapled mechanical anastomoses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; BAR; Biofragmentable anastomotic ring; ColonRing; Compression anastomosis; NiTi CAR

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28132113     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1583-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  47 in total

1.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Mette T Haahr; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Lesley Wood; Matthias Egger; Lise Lotte Gluud; Kenneth F Schulz; Peter Jüni; Douglas G Altman; Christian Gluud; Richard M Martin; Anthony J G Wood; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-03

3.  Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model.

Authors:  David Stewart; Steven Hunt; Richard Pierce; Margaret Frisella; Kathryn Cook; Barry Starcher; James Fleshman
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Compression anastomotic ring-locking procedure (CARP) is a safe and effective method for intestinal anastomoses following left-sided colonic resection.

Authors:  Dadi Vilhjalmsson; Stefan Appelros; Ervin Toth; Ingvar Syk; Anders Grönberg; Tommie Mynster; Henrik Thorlacius
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients.

Authors:  Koianka Trencheva; Kevin P Morrissey; Martin Wells; Carol A Mancuso; Sang W Lee; Toyooki Sonoda; Fabrizio Michelassi; Mary E Charlson; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The number of patients and events required to limit the risk of overestimation of intervention effects in meta-analysis--a simulation study.

Authors:  Kristian Thorlund; Georgina Imberger; Michael Walsh; Rong Chu; Christian Gluud; Jørn Wetterslev; Gordon Guyatt; Philip J Devereaux; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Antonio Cherubini; Francesco Cozzolino; Rita De Florio; Maria Laura Luchetta; Joseph M Rimland; Ilenia Folletti; Mauro Marchesi; Antonella Germani; Massimiliano Orso; Paolo Eusebi; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-05-27

8.  Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Benoit Villain; Agnès Dechartres; Patrick Boyer; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.

Authors:  J Savović; He Jones; Dg Altman; Rj Harris; P Jűni; J Pildal; B Als-Nielsen; Em Balk; C Gluud; Ll Gluud; Jpa Ioannidis; Kf Schulz; R Beynon; N Welton; L Wood; D Moher; Jj Deeks; Jac Sterne
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Thirty-seven patients treated with the C-seal: protection of stapled colorectal anastomoses with a biodegradable sheath.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Henk O ten Cate Hoedemaker; Jeroen W A Leijtens; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.755

Review 2.  Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Haleh Pak; Leila Haji Maghsoudi; Ali Soltanian; Farshid Gholami
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 3.  The triune of intestinal microbiome, genetics and inflammatory status and its impact on the healing of lower gastrointestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  Jou A Lee; Timothy J A Chico; Stephen A Renshaw
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.542

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.