Literature DB >> 20345895

Experience restores innate female preference for male ultrasonic vocalizations.

K N Shepard1, R C Liu.   

Abstract

Mouse models are increasingly contributing to our understanding of the neural genetics of sensory processing and memory. For example, strain differences have helped elucidate basic mechanisms of age-related hearing loss and auditory fear conditioning. Assessing sensory differences arising in acoustic communication contexts is also important for understanding natural audition. While this topic has not been well studied, it is currently being addressed through auditory neuroethological studies in the CBA/CaJ strain, where insights will help lay a foundation for future neural genetic studies. Here, we focus on the responses of adult females to ultrasonic vocalizations of males. We tested a group of female mice in a place-preference paradigm before and after auditory and olfactory experience with a male. A control group was housed with other female cagemates between trials. All females showed an initial preference for male calls that rapidly decayed over the course of a trial. However, only females that had been pair-housed with a male during the inter-trial interval displayed a reinstated interest in male vocalizations, suggesting possible group differences in the assessment of the calls' behavioral relevance. These findings provide a timeframe during which auditory processing of male ultrasounds might be expected to show a difference depending on behavioral relevance, and also suggest an importance of social interactions in maintaining call recognition.
© 2010 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20345895      PMCID: PMC2947590          DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  38 in total

1.  On cortical coding of vocal communication sounds in primates.

Authors:  X Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Refining the dual olfactory hypothesis: pheromone reward and odour experience.

Authors:  Fernando Martínez-García; Joana Martínez-Ricós; Carmen Agustín-Pavón; Jose Martínez-Hernández; Amparo Novejarque; Enrique Lanuza
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Features of the genetically defined anxiety in mice.

Authors:  D F Avgustinovich; T V Lipina; N P Bondar; O V Alekseyenko; N N Kudryavtseva
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Differences in anxiety-related behaviours and in sensitivity to diazepam in inbred and outbred strains of mice.

Authors:  G Griebel; C Belzung; G Perrault; D J Sanger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Integrating genomes, brain and behavior in the study of songbirds.

Authors:  David F Clayton; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Sarah E London
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Dissecting natural sensory plasticity: hormones and experience in a maternal context.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Over-representation of species-specific vocalizations in the awake mouse inferior colliculus.

Authors:  C V Portfors; P D Roberts; K Jonson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Ultrasonic vocalizations: a tool for behavioural phenotyping of mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Scattoni; Jacqueline Crawley; Laura Ricceri
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Inhibitory plasticity in a lateral band improves cortical detection of natural vocalizations.

Authors:  Edgar E Galindo-Leon; Frank G Lin; Robert C Liu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Female mice respond to male ultrasonic 'songs' with approach behaviour.

Authors:  K Hammerschmidt; K Radyushkin; H Ehrenreich; J Fischer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  28 in total

1.  Single-neuron recordings from unanesthetized mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Stephan D Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Context-dependent fluctuation of serotonin in the auditory midbrain: the influence of sex, reproductive state and experience.

Authors:  Jessica L Hanson; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  The role of ultrasonic vocalizations in mouse communication.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors; David J Perkel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Call divergence in three sympatric Rattus species.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Qian-Qian Su; Jiao Qin; Quan-Sheng Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Translational Mouse Models of Autism: Advancing Toward Pharmacological Therapeutics.

Authors:  Tatiana M Kazdoba; Prescott T Leach; Mu Yang; Jill L Silverman; Marjorie Solomon; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

6.  Social regulation of serotonin in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Gabrielle L Sell; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Preference in female laboratory mice is influenced by social experience.

Authors:  Laurel A Screven; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.

Authors:  David P Holfoth; Erikson G Neilans; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Evidence for an audience effect in mice: male social partners alter the male vocal response to female cues.

Authors:  Kelly M Seagraves; Ben J Arthur; S E Roian Egnor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Auditory processing for contrast enhancement of salient communication vocalizations.

Authors:  Alex G Dunlap; Frank Lin; Robert Liu
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.