Literature DB >> 27207951

Evidence for an audience effect in mice: male social partners alter the male vocal response to female cues.

Kelly M Seagraves1, Ben J Arthur2, S E Roian Egnor3.   

Abstract

Mice (Mus musculus) form large and dynamic social groups and emit ultrasonic vocalizations in a variety of social contexts. Surprisingly, these vocalizations have been studied almost exclusively in the context of cues from only one social partner, despite the observation that in many social species the presence of additional listeners changes the structure of communication signals. Here, we show that male vocal behavior elicited by female odor is affected by the presence of a male audience - with changes in vocalization count, acoustic structure and syllable complexity. We further show that single sensory cues are not sufficient to elicit this audience effect, indicating that multiple cues may be necessary for an audience to be apparent. Together, these experiments reveal that some features of mouse vocal behavior are only expressed in more complex social situations, and introduce a powerful new assay for measuring detection of the presence of social partners in mice.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mouse; Social behavior; Social network; Ultrasonic vocalization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207951      PMCID: PMC4874560          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.129361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  29 in total

1.  Male swordtails court with an audience in mind.

Authors:  Heidi S Fisher; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Loss of sex discrimination and male-male aggression in mice deficient for TRP2.

Authors:  Lisa Stowers; Timothy E Holy; Markus Meister; Catherine Dulac; Georgy Koentges
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Standardization of the Whitten Effect to induce susceptibility to Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female mice.

Authors:  S J Dalal; J S Estep; I E Valentin-Bon; A E Jerse
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2001-03

4.  Ultrasound and aggressive behaviour in rats and other small mammals.

Authors:  G D Sales
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Susceptibility to the audience effect explains performance gap between children with and without autism in a theory of mind task.

Authors:  Coralie Chevallier; Julia Parish-Morris; Natasha Tonge; Lori Le; Judith Miller; Robert T Schultz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-01-06

6.  The effect of olfactory stimuli on the agonistic behaviour of laboratory mice.

Authors:  J H Mackintosh; E C Grant
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1966-10

7.  Audience drives male songbird response to partner's voice.

Authors:  Clémentine Vignal; Nicolas Mathevon; Stéphane Mottin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Affiliative behavior, ultrasonic communication and social reward are influenced by genetic variation in adolescent mice.

Authors:  Jules B Panksepp; Kimberly A Jochman; Joseph U Kim; Jamie J Koy; Ellie D Wilson; Qiliang Chen; Clarinda R Wilson; Garet P Lahvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A juvenile mouse pheromone inhibits sexual behaviour through the vomeronasal system.

Authors:  David M Ferrero; Lisa M Moeller; Takuya Osakada; Nao Horio; Qian Li; Dheeraj S Roy; Annika Cichy; Marc Spehr; Kazushige Touhara; Stephen D Liberles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A role for ultrasonic vocalisation in social communication and divergence of natural populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus).

Authors:  Sophie von Merten; Svenja Hoier; Christine Pfeifle; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  DeepSqueak: a deep learning-based system for detection and analysis of ultrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Kevin R Coffey; Russell G Marx; John F Neumaier
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  High channel count microphone array accurately and precisely localizes ultrasonic signals from freely-moving mice.

Authors:  Megan R Warren; Daniel T Sangiamo; Joshua P Neunuebel
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Owner attention facilitates social play in dog-dog dyads (Canis lupus familiaris): evidence for an interspecific audience effect.

Authors:  Lindsay R Mehrkam; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Audience affects decision-making in a marmoset communication network.

Authors:  Camille R Toarmino; Lauren Wong; Cory T Miller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  22 kHz and 55 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations differentially influence neural and behavioral outcomes: Implications for modeling anxiety via auditory stimuli in the rat.

Authors:  Camila Demaestri; Heather C Brenhouse; Jennifer A Honeycutt
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Dynamic influences on the neural encoding of social valence.

Authors:  Nancy Padilla-Coreano; Kay M Tye; Moriel Zelikowsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 38.755

7.  Cognitive control of song production by humpback whales.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Mariam Ashour; Samantha McAllister
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 2.899

8.  Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap).

Authors:  Reyhaneh Abbasi; Peter Balazs; Maria Adelaide Marconi; Doris Nicolakis; Sarah M Zala; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 9.  Ultrasonic vocalizations in mice: relevance for ethologic and neurodevelopmental disorders studies.

Authors:  Marika Premoli; Maurizio Memo; Sara Anna Bonini
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Mouse vocal emission and acoustic complexity do not scale linearly with the size of a social group.

Authors:  Megan R Warren; Morgan S Spurrier; Daniel T Sangiamo; Rachel S Clein; Joshua P Neunuebel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.