Literature DB >> 20309731

A comparative finite-element analysis of bone failure and load transfer of osseointegrated prostheses fixations.

P K Tomaszewski1, N Verdonschot, S K Bulstra, G J Verkerke.   

Abstract

An alternative solution to conventional stump-socket prosthetic limb attachment is offered by direct skeletal fixation. This study aimed to assess two percutaneous trans-femoral implants, the OPRA system (Integrum AB, Göteborg, Sweden), and the ISP Endo/Exo prosthesis (ESKA Implants AG, Lübeck, Germany) on bone failure and stem-bone interface mechanics both early post-operative (before bony ingrowth) and after full bone ingrowth. Moreover, mechanical consequences of implantation of those implants in terms of changed loading pattern within the bone and potential consequences on long-term bone remodeling were studied using finite-element models that represent the intact femur and implants fitted in amputated femora. Two experimentally measured loads from the normal walking cycle were applied. The analyses revealed that implantation of percutaneous prostheses had considerable effects on stress and strain energy density levels in bone. This was not only caused by the implant itself, but also by changed loading conditions in the amputated leg. The ISP design promoted slightly more physiological strain energy distribution (favoring long-term bone maintenance), but the OPRA design generated lower bone stresses (reducing bone fracture risk). The safety factor against mechanical failure of the two percutaneous designs was relatively low, which could be improved by design optimization of the implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20309731      PMCID: PMC2882037          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-9966-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  27 in total

1.  Finite element analysis of bone stress and strain around a distal osseointegrated implant for prosthetic limb attachment.

Authors:  W Xu; A D Crocombe; S C Hughes
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 2.  Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review.

Authors:  R Brånemark; P I Brånemark; B Rydevik; R R Myers
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Rehabilitation of the trans-femoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: the United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  J Sullivan; M Uden; K P Robinson; S Sooriakumaran
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Risk of failure during gait for direct skeletal attachment of a femoral prosthesis: a finite element study.

Authors:  Benedikt Helgason; Halldór Pálsson; Tómas Philip Rúnarsson; Laurent Frossard; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  BMD and bone geometry in transtibial and transfemoral amputees.

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  [The first osseointegrated percutaneous prosthesis anchor for above-knee amputees].

Authors:  K H Staubach; H Grundei
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.411

7.  Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models.

Authors:  J H Keyak
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems.

Authors:  K Hagberg; R Brånemark
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load.

Authors:  Joyce H Keyak; Yuri Falkinstein
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Osseointegrated trans-femoral amputation prostheses: prospective results of general and condition-specific quality of life in 18 patients at 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kerstin Hagberg; Rickard Brånemark; Björn Gunterberg; Björn Rydevik
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Function of prosthesis components in lower limb amputees with bone-anchored percutaneous implants : Biomechanical aspects].

Authors:  S Blumentritt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Percutaneous osseointegrated prostheses for amputees: Limb compensation in a 12-month ovine model.

Authors:  Trevor J Shelton; J Peter Beck; Roy D Bloebaum; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The Influence of Static Load and Sideways Impact Fall on Extramedullary Bone Plates Used to Treat Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Preclinical Strength Assessment.

Authors:  Pratik Nag; Bhaskar Borgohain; Kashif Akhtar Ahmed; Pranjal Phukan; Neeraj Kumar; Alireza Borjali; Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan; Souptick Chanda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Design features of implants for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses.

Authors:  M Pitkin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  A paradigm for the development and evaluation of novel implant topologies for bone fixation: in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Jason P Long; Scott J Hollister; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Experimental Investigation of Vibration Analysis on Implant Stability for a Novel Implant Design.

Authors:  Shouxun Lu; Benjamin Steven Vien; Matthias Russ; Mark Fitzgerald; Wing Kong Chiu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Finite Element Analysis of Transhumeral and Transtibial Percutaneous Osseointegrated Endoprosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn E Taylor; Heath B Henninger; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

8.  Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  William Anderst; Goeran Fiedler; Kentaro Onishi; Gina McKernan; Tom Gale; Paige Paulus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Christof Hurschler; Marie Föller; Michael Schwarze; Tilman Calliess
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Partial Bone Formation in Additive Manufactured Porous Implants Reduces Predicted Stress and Danger of Fatigue Failure.

Authors:  Vee San Cheong; Paul Fromme; Melanie J Coathup; Aadil Mumith; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.934

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.