Literature DB >> 19150253

Risk of failure during gait for direct skeletal attachment of a femoral prosthesis: a finite element study.

Benedikt Helgason1, Halldór Pálsson, Tómas Philip Rúnarsson, Laurent Frossard, Marco Viceconti.   

Abstract

Direct skeletal attachments for transfemoral amputees have been the subject of clinical trials since the early nineties. This method of attachment allows the amputee an unrestricted range of motion around the hip joint, better sitting comfort, improved sensory feedback through osseoperception, improved limb control and reduced soft tissue problems. However, the length of the rehabilitation period is perceived as a shortcoming by the amputees and the clinicians. The aim of the present study is to estimate the risk of failure during gait, for a patient with direct skeletal attachment of a femoral prosthesis, using finite element analysis (FEA). Material properties and loads were derived from subject-specific data and implant stability assumed secured by bone ingrowth into a porous implant surface. A simplified FEA was used to optimize the implant geometry with respect to load bearing capacity. The resulting geometry was then implemented in a subject-specific FE study. The results indicate that the risk of failure for the implant system is approximately three times greater than what can be expected for an intact femur. The main conclusion, based on the risk of failure factors calculated, is that it is likely that a porous-coated implant could be beneficial for osseointegrated fixation. It is also suggested that the proposed methodology can be used in future studies exploring the mechanical stability of osseointegrated fixation in the view of improving direct skeletal attachments for lower limb amputees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19150253     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  8 in total

1.  New method of fixation of in-bone implanted prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark Pitkin; Charles Cassidy; Raghuveer Muppavarapu; James Raymond; Maxim Shevtsov; Oleg Galibin; Serge D Rousselle
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

2.  A comparative finite-element analysis of bone failure and load transfer of osseointegrated prostheses fixations.

Authors:  P K Tomaszewski; N Verdonschot; S K Bulstra; G J Verkerke
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Design features of implants for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses.

Authors:  M Pitkin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Biomechanical performance of retrograde nail for supracondylar fractures stabilization.

Authors:  Nattapon Chantarapanich; Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip; Banchong Mahaisavariya; Pongwit Siribodhi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Finite Element Analysis of Transhumeral and Transtibial Percutaneous Osseointegrated Endoprosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn E Taylor; Heath B Henninger; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

6.  Towards a validated patient-specific computational modeling framework to identify failure regions in traditional growing rods in patients with early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Aakash Agarwal; Manoj Kodigudla; Amey Kelkar; Daksh Jayaswal; Vijay Goel; Vivek Palepu
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-12-13

7.  Noncontact Strain Monitoring of Osseointegrated Prostheses.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Han-Joo Lee; Kenneth J Loh; Michael D Todd; Joseph Reed; A Drew Barnett
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Loading characteristics data applied on osseointegrated implant by transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses fitted with basic components during daily activities.

Authors:  Laurent Frossard
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-09-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.