Literature DB >> 2710619

Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.

W H Ehrenstein, P Schroeder-Heister, G Heister.   

Abstract

Spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions was investigated under conditions in which the spatial orientation of response keys was either parallel to or perpendicular to the orientation of the stimuli. Subjects responded to green or red lights in the left or right visual field (irrelevant stimulus location). The response keys were oriented horizontally on the left or right side of the body midline parallel to the stimuli, and were pressed with the palms facing down (Condition A), or were oriented orthogonally to the stimuli in the midsaggital plane, either horizontally and pressed with palms facing down (B) or facing up (C), or vertically and pressed with palms facing the body (D). The results for Condition A demonstrate the usual spatial S-R compatibility effect between field of stimulation and spatial position of responding finger. For Conditions B and D, a strong reaction time advantage still obtained for those stimulus-finger pairings that are compatible under Condition A. Condition C revealed an RT advantage for the opposite pairings. This shift of the compatibility effect from Condition B to Condition C indicates that the left/right distinction of fingers does not follow a simple, fixed spatio-anatomical mapping rule. The results are discussed within the framework of a hierarchical model of spatial S-R compatibility, with spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping as factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710619     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  Spatial S-R compatibility under head tilt.

Authors:  P Schroeder-Heister; G Heister; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1988-10

2.  Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions.

Authors:  G Heister; W H Ehrenstein; P Schroeder-Heister
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

3.  On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks.

Authors:  U Arend; J Wandmacher
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1987-08

4.  Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: effects of irrelevant stimulus location.

Authors:  G Heister; W H Ehrenstein; P Schroeder-Heister
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

5.  Evidence for stimulus-response compatibility effects in a divided visual field study of cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  G Heister; P Schroeder-Heister
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1987-11

6.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.

Authors:  J R Simon; J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-10

9.  Electrophysiological study of intrahemispheric S-R compatibility effects elicited by visual directional cues.

Authors:  R Ragot; N Lesevre
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects?

Authors:  E Ladavas; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture.

Authors:  C F Michaels; S Schilder
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

3.  Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Dana Müller; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

4.  Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Akio Nishimura; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-12

5.  The Simon effect and visual motion.

Authors:  W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

6.  Seeing through the cat's eyes: evidence of a spontaneous perspective taking process using a non-human avatar.

Authors:  Gioacchino Garofalo; Luiz L Gawryszewski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.