Literature DB >> 28623521

Exploring for the optimal structural design for the 3D-printing technology for cranial reconstruction: a biomechanical and histological study comparison of solid vs. porous structure.

Jun Young Lim1, Namhyun Kim2, Jong-Chul Park2, Sun K Yoo2, Dong Ah Shin3, Kyu-Won Shim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cranioplasty for recovering skull defects carries the risk for a number of complications. Various materials are used, including autologous bone graft, metallic materials, and non-metallic materials, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. If the use of autologous bone is not feasible, those artificial materials also have constraints in the case of complex anatomy and/or irregular defects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study used metal 3D-printing technology to overcome these existing drawbacks and analyze the clinical and mechanical performance requirements. To find an optimal structure that satisfied the structural and mechanical stability requirements, we evaluated biomechanical stability using finite element analysis (FEA) and mechanical testing. To ensure clinical applicability, the model was subjected to histological evaluation. Each specimen was implanted in the femur of a rabbit and was evaluated using histological measurements and push-out test. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: We believe that our data will provide the basis for future applications of a variety of unit structures and further clinical trials and research, as well as the direction for the study of other patient-specific implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; Additive manufacturing; Biomechanical strength; Bone induction rate; Bone-implant contact; Cranioplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28623521     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3486-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  8 in total

1.  Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays.

Authors:  L E Murr; S M Gaytan; F Medina; H Lopez; E Martinez; B I Machado; D H Hernandez; L Martinez; M I Lopez; R B Wicker; J Bracke
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer.

Authors:  David A Zopf; Scott J Hollister; Marc E Nelson; Richard G Ohye; Glenn E Green
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Preformed titanium cranioplasty after resection of skull base meningiomas - a technical note.

Authors:  Karl-Michael Schebesch; Julius Höhne; Holger G Gassner; Alexander Brawanski
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty for treatment of postcraniotomy infections.

Authors:  Joshua J Wind; Chima Ohaegbulam; Fabio M Iwamoto; Peter M Black; John K Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Ady Thien; Nicolas K K King; Beng Ti Ang; Ernest Wang; Ivan Ng
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 6.  Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature.

Authors:  L R Williams; K F Fan; R P Bentley
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Cranioplasty Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants for Skull Defects.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Park; Jun-Young Lim; In-Sik Yun; Ju-Seong Kim; Su-Heon Woo; Dong-Seok Kim; Kyu-Won Shim
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Cranial reconstruction: 3D biomodel and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing.

Authors:  André Luiz Jardini; Maria Aparecida Larosa; Rubens Maciel Filho; Cecília Amélia de Carvalho Zavaglia; Luis Fernando Bernardes; Carlos Salles Lambert; Davi Reis Calderoni; Paulo Kharmandayan
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.078

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  A retrospective descriptive study of cranioplasty failure rates and contributing factors in novel 3D printed calcium phosphate implants compared to traditional materials.

Authors:  Michael Koller; Daniel Rafter; Gillian Shok; Sean Murphy; Sheena Kiaei; Uzma Samadani
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2020-06-17

2.  Fabrication and In Vitro Evaluation of 3D Printed Porous Polyetherimide Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Xiongfeng Tang; Yanguo Qin; Xinyu Xu; Deming Guo; Wenli Ye; Wenzheng Wu; Ruiyan Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.