Literature DB >> 20304629

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group.

Francesco Sardanelli1, Carla Boetes, Bettina Borisch, Thomas Decker, Massimo Federico, Fiona J Gilbert, Thomas Helbich, Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner, Werner A Kaiser, Michael J Kerin, Robert E Mansel, Lorenza Marotti, Laura Martincich, Louis Mauriac, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Roberto Orecchia, Pietro Panizza, Antonio Ponti, Arnie D Purushotham, Peter Regitnig, Marco Rosselli Del Turco, Fabienne Thibault, Robin Wilson.   

Abstract

The use of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is rapidly increasing. EUSOMA organised a workshop in Milan on 20-21st October 2008 to evaluate the evidence currently available on clinical value and indications for breast MRI. Twenty-three experts from the disciplines involved in breast disease management - including epidemiologists, geneticists, oncologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons - discussed the evidence for the use of this technology in plenary and focused sessions. This paper presents the consensus reached by this working group. General recommendations, technical requirements, methodology, and interpretation were firstly considered. For the following ten indications, an overview of the evidence, a list of recommendations, and a number of research issues were defined: staging before treatment planning; screening of high-risk women; evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; patients with breast augmentation or reconstruction; occult primary breast cancer; breast cancer recurrence; nipple discharge; characterisation of equivocal findings at conventional imaging; inflammatory breast cancer; and male breast. The working group strongly suggests that all breast cancer specialists cooperate for an optimal clinical use of this emerging technology and for future research, focusing on patient outcome as primary end-point. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20304629     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  221 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

Authors:  I Millet; E Pages; D Hoa; S Merigeaud; F Curros Doyon; X Prat; P Taourel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography for evaluating intraductal tumor extension of breast cancer.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  [Guideline for the prevention and early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in high risk patients, particularly in women from HBOC (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) families].

Authors:  Christian F Singer; Muy-Kheng Tea; Gunda Pristauz; Michael Hubalek; Christine Rappaport; Christopher Riedl; Thomas Helbich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Quantitative evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI. A feasibility study with a semi-automatic and automatic software compared to observer-based scores.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Bianca Bignotti; Giulio Tagliafico; Simona Tosto; Alessio Signori; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience?

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Thomas H Helbich; Klaus Preidler; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Optimization of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography depending on clinical indication.

Authors:  Clarisse Dromain; Sandra Canale; Sylvie Saab-Puong; Ann-Katherine Carton; Serge Muller; Eva Maria Fallenberg
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-30

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Hubert Bickel; Katja Pinker; Stephan Polanec; Heinrich Magometschnigg; Georg Wengert; Claudio Spick; Wolfgang Bogner; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size.

Authors:  E M Fallenberg; C Dromain; F Diekmann; F Engelken; M Krohn; J M Singh; B Ingold-Heppner; K J Winzer; U Bick; D M Renz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.