Literature DB >> 20300915

African American's self-report patterns using the National Cancer Institute Colorectal Cancer Screening questionnaire.

Sula Hood1, Vetta L Sanders Thompson, Salimah Cogbill, Lauren D Arnold, Michael Talley, Nicole M Caito.   

Abstract

Studies that examine colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) behaviors and correlates rely on self-reports of screening status. Self-reports of CRCS may be more biased than other self-reported cancer screening because of multiple screening options, tests may be offered in combination, and screening schedules differ for each test. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored the development of a core set of questions to measure self-reported CRCS that are consistent with current guidelines, the NCI Colorectal Cancer Screening questionnaire (NCI CRCS). Several studies support the validity and reliability of this measure; however, none of the existing studies have described African American (AA) responses to items that might be important to clinical decision making and research related to screening adherence. This paper addresses the limited descriptions of AA response patterns to items that comprise the NCI CRCS. The NCI CRCS was administered to 439 AAs 50 to 75 years, participating in the baseline survey of a Center for Excellence in Cancer Communication CRC study. The survey measured self-reported CRCS, factors associated with screening, and response patterns to items that might affect estimates of screening and screening adherence. AA participants reported on CRCS, the test used, and time interval since last screening. Except for queries related to month and year of screening, few participants reported uncertainty in response to items. Two thirds of participants reported receiving CRCS; however, less than half of participants were adherent to guidelines. Less than half reported healthcare provider recommendations to screen. AA participants responded to items on the NCI CRCS as developed. Until new strategies or items are available, interval since last screening appears to be the most appropriate item to estimate AA self-reported CRCS adherence. Strategies are needed to increase physician recommendation to screen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20300915      PMCID: PMC2914823          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-010-0068-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  14 in total

Review 1.  Introduction: Cancer and health disparities.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Helen Meissner; Carrie Klabunde; Barbara K Rimer; Dennis J Ahnen; Roshan Bastani; Margaret T Mandelson; Marion R Nadel; Sherri Sheinfeld-Gorin; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Peter A Briss; Jasmin A Tiro; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Descriptive epidemiology of colorectal cancer in the United States, 1998-2001.

Authors:  Jeannette Jackson-Thompson; Faruque Ahmed; Robert R German; Sue-Min Lai; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a study of ethnically diverse first-degree relatives of CRC cases.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; Beth A Glenn; Annette E Maxwell; Patricia A Ganz; Cynthia M Mojica; L Cindy Chang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  T Byers; B Levin; D Rothenberger; G D Dodd; R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Jasmin A Tiro; Rachel W Vojvodic; Sharon Coan; Pamela M Diamond; Anthony Greisinger; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Limin X Clegg; Elizabeth Ward; Lynn A G Ries; Xiaocheng Wu; Patricia M Jamison; Phyllis A Wingo; Holly L Howe; Robert N Anderson; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Vilma Cokkinides; Gopal K Singh; Cheryll Cardinez; Asma Ghafoor; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gender differences in correlates of colorectal cancer screening among Black Medicare beneficiaries in Baltimore.

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Craig E Pollack; Darcy F Phelan; Diane Markakis; Lee Bone; Gary Shapiro; Jennifer Wenzel; Mollie Howerton; Lawrence Johnson; Mary A Garza; Jean G Ford
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Comparing the use of evidence and culture in targeted colorectal cancer communication for African Americans.

Authors:  Vetta L Sanders Thompson; Bindu Kalesan; Anjanette Wells; Sha-Lai Williams; Nicole M Caito
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-10

3.  Selected sociocultural correlates of physical activity among African-American adults.

Authors:  Salimah A Cogbill; Vetta L Sanders Thompson; Anjali D Deshpande
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Factors affecting African American men's use of online colorectal cancer education.

Authors:  Salimah Cogbill; Brittney Francis; Vetta L Sanders Thompson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.