Literature DB >> 20233756

X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging.

Anders Tingberg1.   

Abstract

Tomosynthesis is a three-dimensional imaging technique based on the reconstruction of several planar radiographs. During the image acquisition in tomosynthesis, the X-ray tube moves around the detector which is often stationary, and a number of projection images are taken from different angles. Individual slices from the reconstructed volume can be studied. With the effective reduction of the visibility of the overlapping normal tissue, the detection of pathological lesions is improved when compared with projection radiography. Up to now, tomosynthesis has mainly been used for breast and chest examinations and, to some extent, also for orthopaedic, angiographic and dental investigations. For chest, tomosynthesis is used as an alternative to computed tomography with significantly lower cost and radiation dose to the patient. Breast tomosynthesis has, in several studies, proved to be an effective tool for improving detection of breast lesions. As tomosynthesis has many properties that make it suitable as a modality for screening, including good diagnostic performance, short examination time and low radiation dose, it is a strong competitor to the current gold standard breast screening modality, i.e. mammography. In this paper, the principles of tomosynthesis will be presented as well as a few clinical studies showing the potential role of tomosynthesis in clinical routine examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20233756     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  15 in total

1.  A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.

Authors:  Yuncheng Zhong; Chao-Jen Lai; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Grating-based phase contrast tomosynthesis imaging: proof-of-concept experimental studies.

Authors:  Ke Li; Yongshuai Ge; John Garrett; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Technical innovation: digital tomosynthesis of the hip following intra-articular administration of contrast.

Authors:  Roland E Gazaille; Michael J Flynn; Walter Page; Sonia Finley; Marnix van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.

Authors:  J Shan; A W Tucker; L R Gaalaas; G Wu; E Platin; A Mol; J Lu; O Zhou
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A Compressed-Sensing Based Blind Deconvolution Method for Image Deblurring in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  K S Kim; S Y Kang; C K Park; G A Kim; S Y Park; Hyosung Cho; C W Seo; D Y Lee; H W Lim; H W Lee; J E Park; T H Woo; J E Oh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Restoration of Full Data from Sparse Data in Low-Dose Chest Digital Tomosynthesis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Effect of radiation dose level on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara A Asplund; Åse A Johnsson; Jenny Vikgren; Angelica Svalkvist; Agneta Flinck; Marianne Boijsen; Valeria A Fisichella; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Digital tomosynthesis for PNS evaluation: comparisons of patient exposure and image quality with plain radiography.

Authors:  Jin Young Yoo; Myung Jin Chung; Boram Choi; Hye Na Jung; Ji Hyun Koo; Young A Bae; Kyeongman Jeon; Hong Sik Byun; Kyung Soo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Breast cancer detection in digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography-a side-by-side review of discrepant cases.

Authors:  K Lång; I Andersson; S Zackrisson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Semi-anthropomorphic photoacoustic breast phantom.

Authors:  Maura Dantuma; Rianne van Dommelen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.