Literature DB >> 11940748

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing the efficacy and gastrointestinal complications of early jejunal feeding with early gastric feeding in critically ill patients.

Juan C Montejo1, Teodoro Grau, Jose Acosta, Sergio Ruiz-Santana, Mercé Planas, Abelardo García-De-Lorenzo, Alfonso Mesejo, Manuel Cervera, Carmen Sánchez-Alvarez, Rafael Núñez-Ruiz, Jorge López-Martínez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications, the efficacy of diet administration, and the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients fed in the stomach or in the jejunum.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized multicenter study.
SETTING: Intensive care units (ICUs) in 11 teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients who could receive early enteral nutrition more than 5 days.
INTERVENTIONS: Enteral nutrition was started in the first 36 hrs after admission. One group was fed with a nasogastric tube (GEN group) and the other in the jejunum through a dual-lumen nasogastrojejunal tube (JEN group).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gastrointestinal complications were previously defined. The efficacy of diet administration was calculated using the volume ratio (expressed as the ratio between administered and prescribed volumes). Nosocomial pneumonia was defined according the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definitions. One hundred ten patients were included (GEN: 51, JEN: 50). Both groups were comparable in age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score. There were no differences in feeding duration, ICU length of stay, or mortality (43% vs. 38%). The JEN group had lesser gastrointestinal complications (57% vs. 24%, p <.001), mainly because of a lesser incidence of increased gastric residuals (49% vs. 2%, p <.001). Volume ratio was similar in both groups. A post hoc analysis showed that the JEN group had a higher volume ratio at day 7 than the GEN group (68% vs. 82%, p <.03) in patients from ICUs with previous experience in jejunal feeding. Both groups had a similar incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (40% vs. 32%).
CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal complications are less frequent in ICU patients fed in the jejunum. Nevertheless, it seems to be a necessary learning curve to achieve better results with a postpyloric access. Early enteral nutrition using a nasojejunal route seems not to be an efficacious measure to decrease nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11940748     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200204000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  40 in total

Review 1.  Gastric Dysmotility in Critically Ill Children: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Authors:  Enid E Martinez; Katherine Douglas; Samuel Nurko; Nilesh M Mehta
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.624

2.  Gastric and Postpyloric Total Enteral Nutrition.

Authors:  Souheil G Abou-Assi; Vikash Khurana; Mitchell L Schubert
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  A comparison of early gastric and post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kwok M Ho; Geoffrey J Dobb; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Feeding duodenostomy decreases the incidence of mechanical obstruction after radical esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Hisaharu Oya; Masahiko Koike; Naoki Iwata; Daisuke Kobayashi; Koji Torii; Yukiko Niwa; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Post-pyloric feeding.

Authors:  Eva Niv; Zvi Fireman; Nachum Vaisman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The Placement of Post-pyloric Feeding Tubes Using DRX-Revolution Mobile X-Ray System in an ICU. A Case Series.

Authors:  Leonid Koyfman; Andrei Schwartz; Yair Benjamin; Alexander Smolikov; Moti Klein; Evgeni Brotfain
Journal:  J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures)       Date:  2016-08-10

Review 8.  An integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials evaluating nasogastric against postpyloris (nasoduodenal and nasojejunal) feeding in critically ill patients admitted in intensive care unit.

Authors:  M S Sajid; A Harper; Q Hussain; L Forni; K K Singh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Perioperative care following complex laryngotracheal reconstruction in infants and children.

Authors:  Punkaj Gupta; Joseph D Tobias; Sunali Goyal; Jacob E Kuperstock; Sana F Hashmi; Jennifer Shin; Christopher J Hartnick; Natan Noviski
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

10.  A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients.

Authors:  Hayden White; Kellie Sosnowski; Khoa Tran; Annelli Reeves; Mark Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.