Literature DB >> 11588461

Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications.

H Mentec1, H Dupont, M Bocchetti, P Cani, F Ponche, G Bleichner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the frequency of and risk factors for increased gastric aspirate volume (GAV) and upper digestive intolerance and their complications during enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Intensive care unit (ICU) in a general hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 153 patients with nasogastric tube feeding.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Upper digestive intolerance was considered when GAV was between 150 and 500 mL at two consecutive measurements, when it was >500 mL, or when vomiting occurred. Forty-nine patients (32%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-42%) presented increased GAV after a median EN duration of 2 days (range, 1-16 days), and 70 patients (46%; 95% CI, 38%-54%) presented upper digestive intolerance. Independent risk factors for high GAV were GAV >20 mL before the start of EN (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.11-4.18; p =.02), GAV >100 mL during EN (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.19; p <.05), sedation during EN (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17-2.71; p =.007), use of catecholamines during EN (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.21-2.70; p =.004). Complications related to high GAV were a lower feed intake (15 +/- 7 vs. 19 +/- 8 kcal/kg/day; p =.0004) and vomiting (53% vs. 23%; p =.0002). Complications related to upper digestive intolerance were the development of pneumonia (43% vs. 24%; p =.01), a longer ICU stay (23 +/- 21 vs. 15 +/- 16 days; p =.007), and a higher ICU mortality (41% vs. 25%; p =.03), even after adjustment for Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04-2.10; p =.028).
CONCLUSION: In ICU patients receiving nasogastric tube feeding, high gastric aspirate volume was frequent, occurred early, and was more frequent in patients with sedation or catecholamines. High gastric aspirate volume was an early marker of upper digestive intolerance, which was associated with a higher incidence of nosocomial pneumonia, a longer ICU stay, and a higher ICU mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11588461     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  80 in total

Review 1.  Enteral nutrition and mucosal immunity: implications for feeding strategies in surgery and trauma.

Authors:  David L Sigalet; Shannon L Mackenzie; S Morad Hameed
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Route of nutrition has no effect on the development of infectious complications.

Authors:  Haldun Selcuk; Mehmet Kanbay; Murat Korkmaz; Pinar Gulsener; Gurden Gur; Ugur Yilmaz; Sedat Boyacioglu
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Tolerance of enteral feeding: from quantity to quality of gastric residual volume?

Authors:  Michele Umbrello; Giovanluigi Elia; Anne Lucia Leona Destrebecq; Gaetano Iapichino
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc marginal structural model study.

Authors:  Jean Reignier; Michael Darmon; Romain Sonneville; Anne-Laure Borel; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Stéphane Ruckly; Bertrand Souweine; Anne-Sylvie Dumenil; Hakim Haouache; Christophe Adrie; Laurent Argaud; Lilia Soufir; Guillaume Marcotte; Virginie Laurent; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Christophe Clec'h; Carole Schwebel; Elie Azoulay; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  [Nutrition and immunonutrition in septic patients].

Authors:  K Mayer; M Schaefer; H Walmrath; F Grimminger; W Seeger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Bedside adherence to clinical practice guidelines for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Quenot; Gaetan Plantefeve; Jean-Luc Baudel; Isabelle Camilatto; Emmanuelle Bertholet; Romain Cailliod; Jean Reignier; Jean-Philippe Rigaud
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Naomi E Cahill; Rupinder Dhaliwal; Miao Wang; Andrew G Day; Ahmed Alenzi; Fiona Aris; John Muscedere; John W Drover; Stephen A McClave
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Diminished functional association between proximal and distal gastric motility in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Nam Q Nguyen; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Marianne Chapman; Richard H Holloway
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Fish oil supplementation in the parenteral nutrition of critically ill medical patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sigrun Friesecke; Christian Lotze; Jenny Köhler; Annegret Heinrich; Stephan B Felix; Peter Abel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  A randomised controlled comparison of early post-pyloric versus early gastric feeding to meet nutritional targets in ventilated intensive care patients.

Authors:  Hayden White; Kellie Sosnowski; Khoa Tran; Annelli Reeves; Mark Jones
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.