Literature DB >> 20231911

Interaction trees with censored survival data.

Xiaogang Su1, Tianni Zhou, Xin Yan, Juanjuan Fan, Song Yang.   

Abstract

We propose an interaction tree (IT) procedure to optimize the subgroup analysis in comparative studies that involve censored survival times. The proposed method recursively partitions the data into two subsets that show the greatest interaction with the treatment, which results in a number of objectively defined subgroups: in some of them the treatment effect is prominent while in others the treatment may have a negligible or even negative effect. The resultant tree structure can be used to explore the overall interaction between treatment and other covariates and help identify and describe possible target populations on which an experimental treatment demonstrates desired efficacy. We follow the standard CART (Breiman, et al., 1984) methodology to develop the interaction tree structure. Variable importance information is extracted via random forests of interaction trees. Both simulated experiments and an analysis of the primary billiary cirrhosis (PBC) data are provided for evaluation and illustration of the proposed procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20231911      PMCID: PMC2835451          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  14 in total

1.  Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies.

Authors:  S Hahn; P R Williamson; J L Hutton; P Garner; E V Flynn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Residual-based tree-structured survival analysis.

Authors:  Sündüz Keleş; Mark R Segal
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Subgroup analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  David I Cook; Val J Gebski; Anthony C Keech
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Relative risk trees for censored survival data.

Authors:  M LeBlanc; J Crowley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A method for testing a prespecified subgroup in clinical trials.

Authors:  Yang Song; George Y H Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

Authors:  S F Assmann; S J Pocock; L E Enos; L E Kasten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Tree-structured prediction for censored survival data and the Cox model.

Authors:  A Ciampi; A Negassa; Z Lou
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Susan E Assmann; Laura E Enos; Linda E Kasten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Multivariate survival trees: a maximum likelihood approach based on frailty models.

Authors:  Xiaogang Su; Juanjuan Fan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Debate: Subgroup analyses in clinical trials: fun to look at - but don't believe them!

Authors:  Peter Sleight
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000
View more
  23 in total

1.  A Simple Method for Estimating Interactions between a Treatment and a Large Number of Covariates.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Ash A Alizadeh; Andrew J Gentles; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Patient subgroup identification for clinical drug development.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Yan Sun; Paul Trow; Saptarshi Chatterjee; Arunava Chakravartty; Lu Tian; Viswanath Devanarayan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Simple subgroup approximations to optimal treatment regimes from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Niko Kaciroti; Bin Nan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  A general statistical framework for subgroup identification and comparative treatment scoring.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Menggang Yu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data.

Authors:  Duy Ngo; Richard Baumgartner; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Dai Feng; Jie Chen; Patrick Schnell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Look before you leap: systematic evaluation of tree-based statistical methods in subgroup identification.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xiwen Ma; Donghui Zhang; Lijiang Geng; Xiaojing Wang; Wei Zheng; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Greedy outcome weighted tree learning of optimal personalized treatment rules.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Guanhua Chen; Shuangge Ma; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Identification of subgroups with differential treatment effects for longitudinal and multiresponse variables.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Loh; Haoda Fu; Michael Man; Victoria Champion; Menggang Yu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The Use of Covariates and Random Effects in Evaluating Predictive Biomarkers Under a Potential Outcome Framework.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Lei Nie; Guoxing Soon; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.