Literature DB >> 29795840

Does Acquiescence Affect Individual Items Consistently?

Chester Chun Seng Kam1, Mingming Zhou1.   

Abstract

Previous research has found the effects of acquiescence to be generally consistent across item aggregates within a single survey (i.e., essential tau-equivalence), but it is unknown whether this phenomenon is consistent at the individual item level. This article evaluated the often assumed but inadequately tested proposition that individual items are affected by acquiescence to the same degree. We modeled an external acquiescence criterion to assess (a) whether it affected scale items consistently and (b) whether it would be strongly correlated with an acquiescence factor based on an assumption of tau-equivalence. The results did not support this assumption. As further evidence, we identified a situation in which this tau-equivalence assumption could potentially be violated. We propose that the response style be best understood within a framework of an acquiescence × item interaction.

Keywords:  acquiescence; bias; response style

Year:  2014        PMID: 29795840      PMCID: PMC5965517          DOI: 10.1177/0013164414560817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  14 in total

Review 1.  THE GREAT RESPONSE-STYLE MYTH.

Authors:  L G RORER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  PERSONALITY ITEM DIFFICULTY AND ACQUIESCENCE.

Authors:  C HANLEY
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1965-06

3.  Response styles onthe MMPI: comparison of clinical and normal samples.

Authors:  D N JACKSON; S MESSICK
Journal:  J Abnorm Soc Psychol       Date:  1962-11

4.  Random intercept item factor analysis.

Authors:  Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Donna L Coffman
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-12

5.  On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006).

Authors:  Christian Geiser; Michael Eid; Fridtjof W Nussbeck
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2008-03

6.  Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?

Authors:  H W Marsh
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-04

7.  Measurement and control of response styles using anchoring vignettes: a model-based approach.

Authors:  Daniel M Bolt; Yi Lu; Jee-Seon Kim
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 8.  Identification of content and style: a two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence.

Authors:  P M Bentler; D N Jackson; S Messick
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Education and prejudice or education and response-set?

Authors:  M R Jackman
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  1973-06

10.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver; M W Bridges
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Validating mental health assessment in Kenya using an innovative gold standard.

Authors:  Leah K Watson; Bonnie N Kaiser; Ali M Giusto; David Ayuku; Eve S Puffer
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2019-06-17

2.  Adapting culturally appropriate mental health screening tools for use among conflict-affected and other vulnerable adolescents in Nigeria.

Authors:  B N Kaiser; C Ticao; C Anoje; J Minto; J Boglosa; B A Kohrt
Journal:  Glob Ment Health (Camb)       Date:  2019-06-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.