Literature DB >> 29795867

A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.

Eunike Wetzel1,2, Jan R Böhnke3, Norman Rose2.   

Abstract

The impact of response styles such as extreme response style (ERS) on trait estimation has long been a matter of concern to researchers and practitioners. This simulation study investigated three methods that have been proposed for the correction of trait estimates for ERS effects: (a) mixed Rasch models, (b) multidimensional item response models, and (c) regression residuals. The methods were compared with respect to their ability of recovering the true latent trait levels. Data were generated according to a unidimensional model with only one trait, a mixed Rasch model with two populations of ERS and non-ERS, and a two-dimensional model incorporating a trait and an ERS dimension. The data were analyzed using the same models as well as linear regression where the trait estimate is regressed on an ERS score and the resulting residual is considered the corrected trait estimate. Over all conditions, the two-dimensional model achieved the best trait recovery, though the difference to the unidimensional model was rather small. Mixed Rasch models were in general inferior to the other correction methods. When the trait and ERS showed no to weak correlations, ERS appeared to have a minor impact on trait estimation.

Keywords:  extreme response style; mixed Rasch models; multidimensional item response models; regression residuals; response styles

Year:  2015        PMID: 29795867      PMCID: PMC5965587          DOI: 10.1177/0013164415591848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  4 in total

1.  Correcting personality scales for response sets or suppression effects.

Authors:  H WEBSTER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Modeling multiple response processes in judgment and choice.

Authors:  Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-04-30

3.  The stability of individual response styles.

Authors:  Bert Weijters; Maggie Geuens; Niels Schillewaert
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-03

4.  The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.

Authors:  Eunike Wetzel; Oliver Lüdtke; Ingo Zettler; Jan R Böhnke
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2015-05-18
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Modeling Wording Effects Does Not Help in Recovering Uncontaminated Person Scores: A Systematic Evaluation With Random Intercept Item Factor Analysis.

Authors:  María Dolores Nieto; Luis Eduardo Garrido; Agustín Martínez-Molina; Francisco José Abad
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02

2.  Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.

Authors:  Tanja Kutscher; Michael Eid; Claudia Crayen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-13

3.  Does 'online confidence' predict application success and later academic performance in medical school? A UK-based national cohort study.

Authors:  Paul A Tiffin; Lewis W Paton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Measurement Invariance of Three Narcissism Questionnaires Across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.

Authors:  Eunike Wetzel; Felix J Lang; Mitja D Back; Michele Vecchione; Radoslaw Rogoza; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-05-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.