Literature DB >> 20227696

Statistical shape modeling describes variation in tibia and femur surface geometry between Control and Incidence groups from the osteoarthritis initiative database.

Todd L Bredbenner1, Travis D Eliason, Ryan S Potter, Robert L Mason, Lorena M Havill, Daniel P Nicolella.   

Abstract

We hypothesize that variability in knee subchondral bone surface geometry will differentiate between patients at risk and those not at risk for developing osteoarthritis (OA) and suggest that statistical shape modeling (SSM) methods form the basis for developing a diagnostic tool for predicting the onset of OA. Using a subset of clinical knee MRI data from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI), the objectives of this study were to (1) utilize SSM to compactly and efficiently describe variability in knee subchondral bone surface geometry and (2) determine the efficacy of SSM and rigid body transformations to distinguish between patients who are not expected to develop osteoarthritis (i.e. Control group) and those with clinical risk factors for OA (i.e. Incidence group). Quantitative differences in femur and tibia surface geometry were demonstrated between groups, although differences in knee joint alignment measures were not statistically significant, suggesting that variability in individual bone geometry may play a greater role in determining joint space geometry and mechanics. SSM provides a means of explicitly describing complete articular surface geometry and allows the complex spatial variation in joint surface geometry and joint congruence between healthy subjects and those with clinical risk of developing or existing signs of OA to be statistically demonstrated. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227696      PMCID: PMC2997679          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  33 in total

1.  Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo.

Authors:  Jan Hohe; Gerard Ateshian; Maximilian Reiser; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Hiromasa Miura; Ryuji Nagamine; Taro Mawatari; Masami Tokunaga; Ryotaro Nabeyama; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration.

Authors:  Daniel Rueckert; Alejandro F Frangi; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data.

Authors:  H J Mankin; H Dorfman; L Lippiello; A Zarins
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Risk factors for progressive cartilage loss in the knee: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study in forty-three patients.

Authors:  Sandip Biswal; Trevor Hastie; Thomas P Andriacchi; Gabrielle A Bergman; Michael F Dillingham; Philipp Lang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-11

Review 6.  Normal and pathological adaptations of articular cartilage to joint loading.

Authors:  J P Arokoski; J S Jurvelin; U Väätäinen; H J Helminen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 7.  Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches.

Authors:  D T Felson; R C Lawrence; M C Hochberg; T McAlindon; P A Dieppe; M A Minor; S N Blair; B M Berman; J F Fries; M Weinberger; K R Lorig; J J Jacobs; V Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Rate of knee cartilage loss after partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  Flavia M Cicuttini; Andrew Forbes; Wang Yuanyuan; Glen Rush; Stephen L Stuckey
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 9.  A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Anne Mündermann; R Lane Smith; Eugene J Alexander; Chris O Dyrby; Seungbum Koo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors.

Authors:  D T Felson; R C Lawrence; P A Dieppe; R Hirsch; C G Helmick; J M Jordan; R S Kington; N E Lane; M C Nevitt; Y Zhang; M Sowers; T McAlindon; T D Spector; A R Poole; S Z Yanovski; G Ateshian; L Sharma; J A Buckwalter; K D Brandt; J F Fries
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Role of bone architecture and anatomy in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-LePain; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Semi-automated landmark-based 3D analysis reveals new morphometric characteristics in the trochlear dysplastic femur.

Authors:  Annemieke Van Haver; Karel De Roo; Matthieu De Beule; Sofie Van Cauter; Emmanuel Audenaert; Tom Claessens; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional bone shape of the knee predicts onset of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Michael A Bowes; Jingbo Niu; Kevin M De Souza; Graham R Vincent; Joyce Goggins; Yuqing Zhang; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-08

4.  Development of a parametric finite element model of the proximal femur using statistical shape and density modelling.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Todd L Bredbenner
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  CORR Insights®: Sex-specific differences of the infraacetabular corridor: a biomorphometric CT-based analysis on a database of 523 pelves.

Authors:  Joseph D Lipman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Tibiofemoral helical axis of motion during the full gait cycle measured using biplane radiography.

Authors:  Tom Gale; William Anderst
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: plate position and biomechanics of the medial tibial plateau.

Authors:  Pilar Martinez de Albornoz; Manuel Leyes; Francisco Forriol; Angelo Del Buono; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Statistical modeling to characterize relationships between knee anatomy and kinematics.

Authors:  Lowell M Smoger; Clare K Fitzpatrick; Chadd W Clary; Adam J Cyr; Lorin P Maletsky; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  3D femur model reconstruction from biplane X-ray images: a novel method based on Laplacian surface deformation.

Authors:  Vikas Karade; Bhallamudi Ravi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Learning osteoarthritis imaging biomarkers from bone surface spherical encoding.

Authors:  Alejandro Morales Martinez; Francesco Caliva; Io Flament; Felix Liu; Jinhee Lee; Peng Cao; Rutwik Shah; Sharmila Majumdar; Valentina Pedoia
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.