Literature DB >> 20223055

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: what are the long-term prospects?

Jennifer E Rusby1, Ruth A Waters, Peter G Nightingale, David W England.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy has known psychological and financial advantages but it is difficult to compare the outcome of various methods of reconstruction. Re-operation rates are an objective measure of surgical intervention required to attain and maintain acceptable cosmesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 95 patients (110 immediate reconstructions) was analysed for number of re-operations required within 5 years of initial surgery, magnitude of procedures, 'survival' of the reconstruction and effect of radiotherapy.
RESULTS: Although more intervention was seen in patients with implant-based reconstruction and the time-course over which autologous and implant-based reconstructions fail is different these did not reach statistical significance. Radiotherapy has a significant effect on failure of implant-based reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, large studies of immediate reconstruction are required to assess adequately the impact of type of reconstruction on re-operation rates. The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit is ideally placed to provide answers to remaining questions about longevity of immediate breast reconstruction and the effect that late failure has on patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223055      PMCID: PMC3080066          DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12628812458770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S S Kroll; B Baldwin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer.

Authors:  Roy M Greenway; Leon Schlossberg; William C Dooley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; J E Woods; W M O'Fallon; C M Beard; L T Kurland; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.

Authors:  A Khoo; S S Kroll; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb; B J Baldwin; B G Wang; M A Schusterman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  How many procedures to make a breast?

Authors:  A D Malyon; M Husein; E M Weiler-Mithoff
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction.

Authors:  K B Clough; J M O'Donoghue; A D Fitoussi; G Vlastos; M C Falcou
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction.

Authors:  K B Clough; J M O'Donoghue; A D Fitoussi; C Nos; M C Falcou
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Edwin G Wilkins; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast.

Authors:  D K Wellisch; W S Schain; R B Noone; J W Little
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.730

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Unilateral Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A French Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jacques Dauplat; Emilie Thivat; Philippe Rouanet; Emmanuel Delay; Krishna Clough; Jean-Luc Verhaeghe; Ines Raoust; Marie Bannier; Perig Lemasurier; Christophe Pomel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.