Literature DB >> 11391188

Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction.

K B Clough1, J M O'Donoghue, A D Fitoussi, C Nos, M C Falcou.   

Abstract

The long-term cosmetic outcome of breast implant reconstruction is unknown. The morbidity and cosmetic outcome of 360 patients who underwent immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction with various types of implants have been analyzed prospectively over a 9-year period. Of these patients, 334 who completed their reconstruction were suitable for evaluation of their cosmetic outcome. The early complication rate (< 2 months) was 9.2 percent, with an explantation rate of 1.7 percent. The late complication rate (> 2 months) was 23 percent, with a pathological capsular contracture rate of 11 percent at 2 years and 15 percent at 5 years and an implant removal rate of 7 percent. The revisional surgery rate was 30.2 percent. The cosmetic results were assessed prospectively using an objective five-point global scale. Every patient was scored at each visit once surgery was completed. The overall cosmetic outcome deteriorated in a linear fashion, from an initial acceptable result of 86 percent 2 years after patients completed their reconstruction to only 54 percent at 5 years. This decline in cosmetic outcome was not associated with the type of implant used, the volume of the implant, the age of the patient, or the type of mastectomy incision employed. Radiotherapy was not a significant factor because only 28 patients were irradiated. Upon Cox model analysis, pathological capsular contracture was the only factor that contributed significantly to a poor cosmetic outcome in which p < 0.0001 (relative risk 6.3). Despite a high revisional surgery rate, deterioration still occurred, suggesting that other unaccounted for variables were responsible. On photographic retrospective review of the patients without capsular contracture who demonstrated deterioration in their cosmetic scores, it became clear that a possible reason for their poor results was late asymmetry produced by the failure of both breasts to undergo symmetrical ptosis with aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11391188     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200106000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  24 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Piercarlo Rey; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Stefano Martella; Andrea Manconi; Benedetta Barbieri; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Trends in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  A novel quantitative measure of breast curvature based on catenary.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Si Chen; Gregory P Reece; Melissa A Crosby; Elisabeth K Beahm; Mia K Markey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Ahmed; A Snelling; M Bains; I H Whitworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-23

6.  Immediate bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark V Schaverien
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Capsular contracture in implant based breast reconstruction-the effect of porcine acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  Alessia M Lardi; Mark Ho-Asjoe; Klaus Junge; Jian Farhadi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

8.  The need for a standardised anthropometric protocol for objective assessment of pre- and postoperative breast surgery.

Authors:  Nicola Brown; Joanna Scurr
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2012-11

Review 9.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

10.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.