Literature DB >> 20219743

To females of a noctuid moth, male courtship songs are nothing more than bat echolocation calls.

Ryo Nakano1, Takuma Takanashi, Niels Skals, Annemarie Surlykke, Yukio Ishikawa.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that intraspecific ultrasonic communication observed in some moths evolved, through sexual selection, subsequent to the development of ears sensitive to echolocation calls of insectivorous bats. Given this scenario, the receiver bias model of signal evolution argues that acoustic communication in moths should have evolved through the exploitation of receivers' sensory bias towards bat ultrasound. We tested this model using a noctuid moth Spodoptera litura, males of which were recently found to produce courtship ultrasound. We first investigated the mechanism of sound production in the male moth, and subsequently the role of the sound with reference to the female's ability to discriminate male courtship songs from bat calls. We found that males have sex-specific tymbals for ultrasound emission, and that the broadcast of either male songs or simulated bat calls equally increased the acceptance of muted males by the female. It was concluded that females of this moth do not distinguish between male songs and bat calls, supporting the idea that acoustic communication in this moth evolved through a sensory exploitation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20219743      PMCID: PMC2936132          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  9 in total

1.  Her odours make him deaf: crossmodal modulation of olfaction and hearing in a male moth.

Authors:  Niels Skals; Peter Anderson; Morten Kanneworff; Christer Löfstedt; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Moths are not silent, but whisper ultrasonic courtship songs.

Authors:  R Nakano; T Takanashi; T Fujii; N Skals; A Surlykke; Y Ishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycle.

Authors:  J R Barber; W E Conner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Moths produce extremely quiet ultrasonic courtship songs by rubbing specialized scales.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Niels Skals; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke; Takuji Koike; Keisuke Yoshida; Hirotaka Maruyama; Sadahiro Tatsuki; Yukio Ishikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Christopher G Christie
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  'Un chant d'appel amoureux': acoustic communication in moths

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Selective forces on origin, adaptation and reduction of tympanal ears in insects.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Moth hearing and sound communication.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Variation in courtship ultrasounds of three Ostrinia moths with different sex pheromones.

Authors:  Takuma Takanashi; Ryo Nakano; Annemarie Surlykke; Haruki Tatsuta; Jun Tabata; Yukio Ishikawa; Niels Skals
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Double meaning of courtship song in a moth.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Fumio Ihara; Koji Mishiro; Masatoshi Toyama; Satoshi Toda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; James H Fullard; Benjamin J Arthur; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Male moth songs tempt females to accept mating: the role of acoustic and pheromonal communication in the reproductive behaviour of Aphomia sociella.

Authors:  Jiří Kindl; Blanka Kalinová; Milan Červenka; Milan Jílek; Irena Valterová
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Extreme Duty Cycles in the Acoustic Signals of Tiger Moths: Sexual and Natural Selection Operating in Parallel.

Authors:  Y Fernández; N J Dowdy; W E Conner
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-01-05

10.  Evolution of deceptive and true courtship songs in moths.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke; Niels Skals; Yukio Ishikawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.