Literature DB >> 9748154

Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.

M J Ryan1.   

Abstract

REVIEW Recent approaches to analyzing the evolution of female mating preferences emphasize how historical influences on female receiver systems can bias the evolution of male traits that females find attractive. These studies combine animal behavior, sensory biology, phylogenetics, and artificial neural network models. They attempt to understand why specific phenotypes involved in sexual selection have evolved, rather than merely determining whether such traits and preferences are adaptive. It is now clear that traits and preferences often do not coevolve via genetic correlations, that female mating preferences for a given male trait are influenced by adaptations and constraints outside of the context of female responses to that particular trait, and that receiver biases can explain much of the diversity in male signaling phenotypes. It also appears that an understanding of historical effects will prove valuable in investigating why neural and cognitive systems respond to sensory stimuli as they do.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9748154     DOI: 10.1126/science.281.5385.1999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  72 in total

1.  Sensory exploitation as an evolutionary origin to nuptial food gifts in insects.

Authors:  S K Sakaluk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit?

Authors:  F Helen Rodd; Kimberly A Hughes; Gregory F Grether; Colette T Baril
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Vestigial preference functions in neural networks and túngara frogs.

Authors:  S M Phelps; M J Ryan; A S Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A generalized female bias for long tails in a short-tailed widowbird.

Authors:  Sarah R Pryke; Staffan Andersson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The evolution of signal form: effects of learned versus inherited recognition.

Authors:  Masashi Kamo; Stefano Ghirlanda; Magnus Enquist
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Co-option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds.

Authors:  G Borgia; S W Coleman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Avian psychology and communication.

Authors:  Candy Rowe; John Skelhorn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Historical contingency affects signaling strategies and competitive abilities in evolving populations of simulated robots.

Authors:  Steffen Wischmann; Dario Floreano; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Widespread genetic linkage of mating signals and preferences in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala.

Authors:  Chris Wiley; Christopher K Ellison; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Calling song recognition in female crickets: temporal tuning of identified brain neurons matches behavior.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kostarakos; Berthold Hedwig
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.