Literature DB >> 2021567

Perceived risk not actual risk predicts uptake of amniocentesis.

T M Marteau1, J Kidd, R Cook, S Michie, M Johnston, J Slack, R W Shaw.   

Abstract

A consecutive cohort of 71 women eligible for amniocentesis because they were over 38 years of age completed questionnaires during the first trimester of pregnancy. Sixty-one women underwent amniocentesis, an uptake rate of 86%. Uptake was associated with a less negative attitude towards termination of an affected baby and a higher perceived risk of the fetus being abnormal. It was not associated with actual age-related risks. There was no significant relation between actual risk and perceived risk. The results of this study suggests that it is important for doctors to understand the basis of women's decisions to have amniocentesis, and the difference between actual and perceived risk if they are to communicate effectively with women about the test and their options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2021567     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  12 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Correlates of genetic counseling and testing among Orthodox Jews.

Authors:  Shulamis Juni Pollak
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2009-08-11

Review 4.  The new genetics. Psychological responses to genetic testing.

Authors:  T M Marteau; R T Croyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

5.  Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Authors:  Jessica L Wilson; Gail M Ferguson; Judith M Thorn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Update and Review: Maternal Serum Screening.

Authors:  K E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Racial-ethnic differences in genetic amniocentesis uptake.

Authors:  Jennifer B Saucier; Dennis Johnston; Catherine A Wicklund; Patricia Robbins-Furman; Jacqueline T Hecht; Manju Monga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A Qualitative Study to Explore the Views and Attitudes towards Prenatal Testing in Adults Who Have Muenke Syndrome and their Partners.

Authors:  Julie Phipps; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  A retrospective survey of community based utilization of Tay Sachs screening in Eight New Jersey counties.

Authors:  R Wallerstein; K Seshadri; S Brady-Yasbin; L Y Shih; D F Wallerstein
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  P T Dick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.