Literature DB >> 20207787

Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.

Jónína Gudjónsdóttir1, Borgny Ween, Dag Rune Olsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) examinations account for a significant portion of individuals' increasing exposure to medical radiation. Automatic exposure control (AEC) was introduced in CT scanners to decrease patient doses while maintaining appropriate image quality.
OBJECTIVE: To identify areas for AEC optimization and suggest practical optimization methods.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted to assess current knowledge regarding tube current modulation and AEC in CT from peer-reviewed journals and publications from national and international organizations involved in medical imaging and radiation protection.
RESULTS: Four important aspects of AEC use were identified: interaction of user-selectable parameters with AEC, patient positioning and AEC, specific challenges with patient size groups and how to select appropriate input value.
CONCLUSION: AEC is a useful tool for dose optimization but dose savings are not guaranteed unless the equipment is used properly. Further research is required into optimal use of AEC, particularly for pediatric examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Technol        ISSN: 0033-8397


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of scan settings on automatic tube current modulation in CT using a novel phantom.

Authors:  Deborah Merzan; Patrik Nowik; Gavin Poludniowski; Robert Bujila
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Radiation risk and protection of patients in clinical SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Elke A Nekolla; Markus Borowski; Dietmar Noßke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Excess of Radiation Burden for Young Testicular Cancer Patients using Automatic Exposure Control and Contrast Agent on Whole-body Computed Tomography Imaging.

Authors:  Hannele Niiniviita; Jarmo Kulmala; Tuukka Pölönen; Heli Määttänen; Hannu Järvinen; Eeva Salminen
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  A reproducible semi-automatic method to quantify the muscle-lipid distribution in clinical 3D CT images of the thigh.

Authors:  Alexander Mühlberg; Oleg Museyko; Jean-Denis Laredo; Klaus Engelke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Radiation exposure per thrombectomy attempt in modern endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior circulation.

Authors:  Charlotte S Weyland; Fatih Seker; Arne Potreck; Christian Hametner; Peter A Ringleb; Markus A Möhlenbruch; Martin Bendszus; Johannes A R Pfaff
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Louise Giansante; Juliana C Martins; Denise Y Nersissian; Karen C Kiers; Fernando U Kay; Marcio V Y Sawamura; Choonsik Lee; Eloisa M M S Gebrim; Paulo R Costa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Automatic current selection with iterative reconstruction reduces effective dose to less than 1 mSv in low-dose chest computed tomography in persons with normal BMI.

Authors:  Li-Guo Chen; Ping-An Wu; Min-Huei Sheu; Hsing-Yang Tu; Li-Chuan Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Effect of Body Mass Index in Coronary CT Angiography Performed on a 256-Slice Multi-Detector CT Scanner.

Authors:  Wei-Yip Law; Guan-Lin Huang; Ching-Ching Yang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27

9.  CT protocol management: simplifying the process by using a master protocol concept.

Authors:  Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Robert K Bour; Nicholas Rubert; Gary Wendt; Myron Pozniak; Frank N Ranallo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.