Literature DB >> 20197084

Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.

Dan Gnansia1, Daniel Pressnitzer, Vincent Péan, Bernard Meyer, Christian Lorenzi.   

Abstract

Speech intelligibility is degraded in the presence of a competing talker for cochlear implantees, presumably because of impaired tracking and integration of speech segments glimpsed in the masker valleys. This hypothesis was tested by assessing the intelligibility of periodically-interrupted bisyllables produced by a male and female talker, for normal-hearing listeners and implantees. A 4-Hz square-wave modulator with random phase was used to interrupt bisyllables from each talker. Stimuli were either presented alone (Experiment I) or interleaved (Experiment II: the two talkers were alternated). In Experiment I, the mean identification score for each voice was 88% for normal-hearing listeners and 35% for implantees. In Experiment II, the mean score corresponding to correct identification of both voices was 50% for normal-hearing listeners and 5% for implantees. Implantees identified at least one bisyllable among the two well above chance level but showed difficulties assigning it to the correct talker. This suggests that implantees can make use of partial information, but cannot track and integrate the non-adjacent components of interleaved speech as well as normal-hearing listeners. Additional results obtained with normal-hearing listeners tested with tone-vocoded syllables suggest that impaired tracking/integration for implantees stems from limited reception of spectral and temporal fine structure cues. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20197084     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Level considerations for chimeric processing: Temporal envelope and fine structure contributions to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jenine L Entwistle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

4.  Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of amplitude modulation cues recovered from frequency modulation for cochlear implant users when original speech cues are severely degraded.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Hyun Joon Shim; Christian Lorenzi; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-15

6.  Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.

Authors:  Brittany N Jaekel; Rochelle S Newman; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

9.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual learning of interrupted speech.

Authors:  Michel Ruben Benard; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.