Literature DB >> 20195720

Parental attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions about genetic testing for FAP and colorectal cancer surveillance in minors.

Fallon R Levine1, James E Coxworth, David A Stevenson, Thérèse Tuohy, Randall W Burt, Anita Y Kinney.   

Abstract

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is the second most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome and confers a nearly 100% lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer. Understanding factors that facilitate and inhibit genetic testing and cancer surveillance in children who are members of families affected by FAP will better equip clinicians to clarify misunderstandings and facilitate appropriate care. The aims of this study were to examine parental attitudes and beliefs regarding endoscopic surveillance and genetic testing in minors at risk for developing FAP. This cross-sectional study includes analyses of qualitative and quantitative interview data collected from parents of children with or at risk for FAP. This report includes data from 28 parents with a total of 51 biological children between 10-17 years of age. The parents had a clinical and/or genetic diagnosis of FAP. Most commonly reported facilitators included provider recommendation (surveillance) and personalized medical management (genetic testing). Most commonly reported barriers included lack of provider recommendation (surveillance) and cost (genetic testing).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195720      PMCID: PMC3020788          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9285-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  40 in total

1.  Use of fear-appeal techniques in the design of tailored cancer risk communication messages: implications for healthcare providers.

Authors:  Kevin M Sweet; Sharla K Willis; Sato Ashida; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Primary and secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Angie S Price
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.978

3.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening: an overview of current trends.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Victoria Champion
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.208

5.  Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact.

Authors:  S Michie; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Understanding why negative genetic test results sometimes fail to reassure.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Jonathan A Smith; Victoria Senior; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Patients' fear of genetic discrimination by health insurers: the impact of legal protections.

Authors:  M A Hall; S S Rich
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  14 in total

1.  Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a Survey of Perspectives on Carrier Testing and Communication Within the Family.

Authors:  Brenna Hayes; Susan Hassed; Jae Lindsay Chaloner; Christopher E Aston; Carrie Guy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Genetic testing in families with hereditary colorectal cancer in British Columbia and Yukon: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Vivienne K Beard; Angela C Bedard; Jennifer Nuk; Petra W C Lee; Quan Hong; James E J Bedard; Sophie Sun; Kasmintan A Schrader
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-10-19

5.  Uptake of Predictive Genetic Testing and Cardiac Evaluation for Children at Risk for an Inherited Arrhythmia or Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Susan Christian; Joseph Atallah; Robin Clegg; Michael Giuffre; Cathleen Huculak; Tara Dzwiniel; Jillian Parboosingh; Sherryl Taylor; Martin Somerville
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Genetic Testing Experiences Among Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the United States.

Authors:  Shixi Zhao; Wei-Ju Chen; Shweta U Dhar; Tanya N Eble; Oi-Man Kwok; Lei-Shih Chen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-12

8.  Health behaviors in patients and families with hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Allison M Burton; Shelly R Hovick; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06

9.  A proposed staging system and stage-specific interventions for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Patrick M Lynch; Jeffrey S Morris; Sijin Wen; Shailesh M Advani; William Ross; George J Chang; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Gottumukkala S Raju; Luigi Ricciardiello; Takeo Iwama; Benedito M Rossi; Maria Pellise; Elena Stoffel; Paul E Wise; Lucio Bertario; Brian Saunders; Randall Burt; Andrea Belluzzi; Dennis Ahnen; Nagahide Matsubara; Steffen Bülow; Niels Jespersen; Susan K Clark; Steven H Erdman; Arnold J Markowitz; Inge Bernstein; Niels De Haas; Sapna Syngal; Gabriela Moeslein
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  How harmful is genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in young children; the parents' experience.

Authors:  Anna A Kattentidt-Mouravieva; M den Heijer; I van Kessel; A Wagner
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.