Literature DB >> 24838933

How harmful is genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in young children; the parents' experience.

Anna A Kattentidt-Mouravieva1, M den Heijer, I van Kessel, A Wagner.   

Abstract

Predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is routinely offered to children at-risk from the age of 10 years onwards. Predictive testing for FAP at a younger age is debatable, because of absence of medical benefits. However, circumstances may arise when testing at a younger age (<10 years) is appropriate. Currently, there is a lack of published experience with predictive testing of children at this young age. We evaluated 13 children who were tested for FAP at the age younger than 10 years; 7 mutation-carriers and 6 non-carriers. Parents of these children were re-contacted and open-ended semi-structured interviewed. None of the contacted parents regretted the timing of genetic testing. The major reasons for testing at the young age were (1) testing of all children in the family at the same moment; (2) certainty for the future; and (3) preparing the child for future surveillance. None of the parents observed changes in mental or physical health in their child after testing. Also, young genetic testing did not lead to colon surveillance before it was indicated. Genetic testing for FAP at a young age is experienced as causing no harm by parents. Future studies should evaluate children's own experiences with early genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838933     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9724-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  27 in total

Review 1.  Testing children for cancer genes: the rule of earliest onset.

Authors:  E D Kodish
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  Inappropriate genetic testing of children.

Authors:  A Fryer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.

Authors:  D S Davis
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Familial adenomatous polyposis: mental health, psychosocial functioning and reactions to genetic risk in adolescents.

Authors:  H Gjone; T H Diseth; O Fausa; T S Nøvik; A Heiberg
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Predictive genetic testing in young people for adult-onset conditions: where is the empirical evidence?

Authors:  R E Duncan; M B Delatycki
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Predictive genetic testing in a young child: a case report.

Authors:  Gillian Crawford; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  GIG response to the UK Clinical Genetics Society report "The genetic testing of children".

Authors:  S Dalby
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Parental attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions about genetic testing for FAP and colorectal cancer surveillance in minors.

Authors:  Fallon R Levine; James E Coxworth; David A Stevenson; Thérèse Tuohy; Randall W Burt; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Parents' responses to predictive genetic testing in their children: report of a single case study.

Authors:  S Michie; V McDonald; M Bobrow; C McKeown; T Marteau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Jaclyn Schienda; Jill Stopfer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.159

3.  Predictive Psychiatric Genetic Testing in Minors: An Exploration of the Non-Medical Benefits.

Authors:  Arianna Manzini; Danya F Vears
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.