Literature DB >> 28194637

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review.

Jayapriya Jayakumaran1, Sejal D Patel2, Bhushan K Gangrade2, Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu3, Soundarya Ramanatha Pandian4, Celso Silva2.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery is a conceptual fusion of the conventional open surgery and the minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. We reviewed the current role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the field of reproductive surgery by a literature search in PubMed database. We analyzed the reported advantages and limitations of the use of robotics in reproductive surgeries like myomectomy, tubal reanastomosis, endometriosis, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian transposition. Overall, robotic assistance in reproductive surgery resulted in decreased blood loss, less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster convalescence, whereas reproductive outcomes were similar to open/laparoscopic approaches. The main drawbacks of robotic surgery were higher cost and longer operating times. It is as safe and effective as the conventional laparoscopy and represents a reasonable alternate to abdominal approach. Procedures that are technically challenging with the conventional laparoscopy can be performed with robotic assistance. It has advantages of improved visualization and Endowrist™ movements allowing precise suturing. This helps to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy, especially in complicated procedures, and may shorten the steep learning curve in minimal invasive surgery. Randomized controlled trials looking at both short- and long-term outcomes are warranted to strengthen the role of robotic surgery in the field of reproductive surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometriosis; Myomectomy; Reproductive surgery; Robotic-assisted laparoscopy; Tubal reanastomosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194637     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0682-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  85 in total

1.  UTERINE RUPTURE DURING PREGNANCY. AN ANALYSIS OF 133 PATIENTS.

Authors:  J D GARNET
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy.

Authors:  Antonio R Gargiulo; Souzana Choussein; Serene S Srouji; Laura E Cedo; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-10

3.  The laparoscopic myomectomy: a survey of Canadian gynaecologists.

Authors:  Grace Liu; Lynne Zolis; Rose Kung; Mary Melchior; Sukhbir Singh; E Francis Cook
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2010-02

4.  Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique.

Authors:  Antonio R Gargiulo; Amelia P Bailey; Serene S Srouji
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-05-31

5.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in conservative surgical treatment for severe endometriosis.

Authors:  P G Crosignani; P Vercellini; F Biffignandi; W Costantini; I Cortesi; E Imparato
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique.

Authors:  Erin I Lewis; Serene S Srouji; Antonio R Gargiulo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Gyusung Lee; F Jacob Seagull; Nora Meenaghan; David Dexter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue.

Authors:  J Donnez; M M Dolmans; D Demylle; P Jadoul; C Pirard; J Squifflet; B Martinez-Madrid; A van Langendonckt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 16-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.

Authors:  Camran Nezhat; Ofer Lavie; Senzan Hsu; James Watson; Ofra Barnett; Madeleine Lemyre
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy.

Authors:  Allison K Rodgers; Jeffrey M Goldberg; Jeffrey P Hammel; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  History, Evolution and Current State of Ovarian Tissue Auto-Transplantation with Cryopreserved Tissue: a Successful Translational Research Journey from 1999 to 2020.

Authors:  Loris Marin; Giuliano Bedoschi; Tai Kawahara; Kutluk H Oktay
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Uptake and outcomes of robotic gynaecological surgery in England (2006-2018): an account of Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES).

Authors:  D El-Hamamsy; R S Geary; I Gurol-Urganci; J van der Meulen; D Tincello
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Renjie Wang; Wei Pan; Lei Jin; Yuehan Li; Yudi Geng; Chun Gao; Gang Chen; Hui Wang; Ding Ma; Shujie Liao
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Pheochromocytoma Presenting as Testicular Pain: An Unusual Case Report.

Authors:  Jinal K Patel; Varun Reddy; Gauthier Stepman; Debra Angelo; Johnathan Frunzi
Journal:  Case Rep Endocrinol       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Tubal Reanastomosis after Sterilization: A Choice for Family Planning.

Authors:  Arwa Salehjawich; Veronika Günther; Zino Ruchay; Mazhar Salim Al Zoubi; Juhi Dhanawat; Nicolai Maass; Johannes Ackermann; Julian Pape; Ibrahim Alkatout
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.