Literature DB >> 20193071

International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle.

Paul M VanRaden1, Peter G Sullivan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genomic evaluations are rapidly replacing traditional evaluation systems used for dairy cattle selection. Higher reliabilities from larger genotype files promote cooperation across country borders. Genomic information can be exchanged across countries using simple conversion equations, by modifying multi-trait across-country evaluation (MACE) to account for correlated residuals originating from the use of foreign evaluations, or by multi-trait analysis of genotypes for countries that use the same reference animals.
METHODS: Traditional MACE assumes independent residuals because each daughter is measured in only one country. Genomic MACE could account for residual correlations using daughter equivalents from genomic data as a fraction of the total in each country and proportions of bulls shared. MACE methods developed to combine separate within-country genomic evaluations were compared to direct, multi-country analysis of combined genotypes using simulated genomic and phenotypic data for 8,193 bulls in nine countries.
RESULTS: Reliabilities for young bulls were much higher for across-country than within-country genomic evaluations as measured by squared correlations of estimated with true breeding values. Gains in reliability from genomic MACE were similar to those of multi-trait evaluation of genotypes but required less computation. Sharing of reference genotypes among countries created large residual correlations, especially for young bulls, that are accounted for in genomic MACE.
CONCLUSIONS: International genomic evaluations can be computed either by modifying MACE to account for residual correlations across countries or by multi-trait evaluation of combined genotype files. The gains in reliability justify the increased computation but require more cooperation than in previous breeding programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20193071      PMCID: PMC2842236          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


  12 in total

1.  Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.

Authors:  A Nejati-Javaremi; C Smith; J P Gibson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Multiple-trait multiple-country genetic evaluations for udder health traits.

Authors:  T Mark; P G Sullivan
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; C P Van Tassell; G R Wiggans; T S Sonstegard; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor; F S Schenkel
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; G R Wiggans
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition.

Authors:  Bernard Grisart; Wouter Coppieters; Frédéric Farnir; Latifa Karim; Christine Ford; Paulette Berzi; Nadine Cambisano; Myriam Mni; Suzanne Reid; Patricia Simon; Richard Spelman; Michel Georges; Russell Snell
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.

Authors:  W F Fikse; G Banos
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires.

Authors:  L R Schaeffer
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 9.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor; Rohan L Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  20 in total

1.  Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  MetaGS: an accurate method to impute and combine SNP effects across populations using summary statistics.

Authors:  Abdulqader Jighly; Haifa Benhajali; Zengting Liu; Mike E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in Animal Breeding with Long Breeding History, the Dairy Cattle Case.

Authors:  Joel Ira Weller
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Guosheng Su; Ole F Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Mark Henryon; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes.

Authors:  Paul M VanRaden; Jeffrey R O'Connell; George R Wiggans; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Estimating genomic breeding values and detecting QTL using univariate and bivariate models.

Authors:  Mario Pl Calus; Han A Mulder; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-05-27

8.  Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Clotilde Patry; Vincent Ducrocq
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A Genome-Wide Association Study for Tolerance to Paratuberculosis Identifies Candidate Genes Involved in DNA Packaging, DNA Damage Repair, Innate Immunity, and Pathogen Persistence.

Authors:  María Canive; Gerard Badia-Bringué; Patricia Vázquez; Joseba M Garrido; Ramón A Juste; Almudena Fernandez; Oscar González-Recio; Marta Alonso-Hearn
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 8.786

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.