Literature DB >> 20192878

Datamining approaches for modeling tumor control probability.

Issam El Naqa1, Joseph O Deasy, Yi Mu, Ellen Huang, Andrew J Hope, Patricia E Lindsay, Aditya Apte, James Alaly, Jeffrey D Bradley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor control probability (TCP) to radiotherapy is determined by complex interactions between tumor biology, tumor microenvironment, radiation dosimetry, and patient-related variables. The complexity of these heterogeneous variable interactions constitutes a challenge for building predictive models for routine clinical practice. We describe a datamining framework that can unravel the higher order relationships among dosimetric dose-volume prognostic variables, interrogate various radiobiological processes, and generalize to unseen data before when applied prospectively.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Several datamining approaches are discussed that include dose-volume metrics, equivalent uniform dose, mechanistic Poisson model, and model building methods using statistical regression and machine learning techniques. Institutional datasets of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are used to demonstrate these methods. The performance of the different methods was evaluated using bivariate Spearman rank correlations (rs). Over-fitting was controlled via resampling methods.
RESULTS: Using a dataset of 56 patients with primary NCSLC tumors and 23 candidate variables, we estimated GTV volume and V75 to be the best model parameters for predicting TCP using statistical resampling and a logistic model. Using these variables, the support vector machine (SVM) kernel method provided superior performance for TCP prediction with an rs=0.68 on leave-one-out testing compared to logistic regression (rs=0.4), Poisson-based TCP (rs=0.33), and cell kill equivalent uniform dose model (rs=0.17).
CONCLUSIONS: The prediction of treatment response can be improved by utilizing datamining approaches, which are able to unravel important non-linear complex interactions among model variables and have the capacity to predict on unseen data for prospective clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20192878      PMCID: PMC4786027          DOI: 10.3109/02841861003649224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  38 in total

Review 1.  Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives.

Authors:  A Brahme
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Angel I Blanco; Vanessa H Clark
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.

Authors:  Patricia E Lindsay; Issam El Naqa; Andrew J Hope; Milos Vicic; Jing Cui; Jeffrey D Bradley; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Analytic investigation into effect of population heterogeneity on parameter ratio estimates.

Authors:  Colleen Schinkel; Marco Carlone; Brad Warkentin; B Gino Fallone
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Single-dose and fractionated irradiation of four human lung cancer cell lines in vitro.

Authors:  O Brodin; L Lennartsson; S Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Implementation of a model for estimating tumor control probability for an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor.

Authors:  A Niemierko; M Goitein
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Assessment of lung cancer response after nonoperative therapy: tumor diameter, bidimensional product, and volume. A serial CT scan-based study.

Authors:  M Werner-Wasik; Y Xiao; E Pequignot; W J Curran; W Hauck
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Analysis of biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer using dose-distribution variables and tumor control probability models.

Authors:  S Levegrün; A Jackson; M J Zelefsky; E S Venkatraman; M W Skwarchuk; W Schlegel; Z Fuks; S A Leibel; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density.

Authors:  S Webb; A E Nahum
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Molecular markers of outcome after radiotherapy in patients with prostate carcinoma: Ki-67, bcl-2, bax, and bcl-x.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Didier Cowen; Patricia Troncoso; Gunar K Zagars; Andrew C von Eschenbach; Marvin L Meistrich; Timothy McDonnell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  14 in total

1.  Artificial Neural Network with Composite Architectures for Prediction of Local Control in Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sunan Cui; Yi Luo; Huan Hsin Tseng; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-29

2.  [Rectal toxicity prediction based on accurate rectal surface dose summation for cervical cancer radiotherapy].

Authors:  Jia-Wei Chen; Hai-Bin Chen; Qiang He; Yu-Liang Liao; Xin Zhen
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Radiogenomics and radiotherapy response modeling.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Sarah L Kerns; James Coates; Yi Luo; Corey Speers; Catharine M L West; Barry S Rosenstein; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A Bayesian network approach for modeling local failure in lung cancer.

Authors:  Jung Hun Oh; Jeffrey Craft; Rawan Al Lozi; Manushka Vaidya; Yifan Meng; Joseph O Deasy; Jeffrey D Bradley; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Automatic assessment of average diaphragm motion trajectory from 4DCT images through machine learning.

Authors:  Guang Li; Jie Wei; Hailiang Huang; Carl Philipp Gaebler; Amy Yuan; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2015-12-29

8.  Mathematical model for the thermal enhancement of radiation response: thermodynamic approach.

Authors:  Adriana M De Mendoza; Soňa Michlíková; Johann Berger; Jens Karschau; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart; Damian D McLeod
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Sample-size calculation for preclinical dose-response experiments using heterogeneous tumour models.

Authors:  Willy Ciecior; Nadja Ebert; Nathalie Borgeaud; Howard D Thames; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Steffen Löck
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.901

10.  Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology: Opportunities, Requirements, and Needs.

Authors:  Mary Feng; Gilmer Valdes; Nayha Dixit; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.