Literature DB >> 20190922

Consumption and response output as a function of unit price: manipulation of cost and benefit components.

Xeres Delmendo1, John C Borrero, Kenneth L Beauchamp, Monica T Francisco.   

Abstract

We conducted preference assessments with 4 typically developing children to identify potential reinforcers and assessed the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli. Next, we tested two predictions of economic theory: that overall consumption (reinforcers obtained) would decrease as the unit price (response requirement per reinforcer) increased and that the cost and benefit components that defined unit price would not influence overall consumption considerably when unit price values were equal. We tested these predictions by arranging unit price such that the denominator was one (e.g., two responses produced one reinforcer) or two (e.g., four responses produced two reinforcers). Results showed that consumption decreased as unit price increased and that unit price values with different components produced similar consumption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral economics; costs and benefits; preference assessment; reinforcer demand; unit price

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20190922      PMCID: PMC2741056          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  31 in total

Review 1.  Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch; M E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Three predictions of the economic concept of unit price in a choice context.

Authors:  G J Madden; W K Bickel; E A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Revealed preference between reinforcers used to examine hypotheses about behavioral consistencies.

Authors:  D Tustin
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2000-07

4.  Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.

Authors:  Theresa A Foster; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

Review 7.  Basic and applied research on choice responding.

Authors:  W W Fisher; J E Mazur
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

9.  The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis.

Authors:  L Peterson; A L Homer; S A Wonderlich
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1982

10.  Reinforcing efficacy of food on performance during pre- and postmeal sessions.

Authors:  Liming Zhou; Brian A Iwata; Bridget A Shore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.