PURPOSE: To determine intra-fraction displacement of the prostate gland from imaging pre- and post-radiotherapy delivery of prostate cancer patients with three implanted fiducial markers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were collected from 184 patients who had two orthogonal X-rays pre- and post-delivery on at least 20 occasions using a Varian On Board kV Imaging system. A total of 5778 image pairs covering time intervals between 3 and 30 min between pre- and post-imaging were evaluated for intra-fraction prostate displacement. RESULTS: The mean three dimensional vector shift between images was 1.7 mm ranging from 0 to 25 mm. No preferential direction of displacement was found; however, there was an increase of prostate displacement with time between images. There was a large variation in typical shifts between patients (range 1 +/- 1 to 6 +/- 2 mm) with no apparent trends throughout the treatment course. Images acquired in the first five fractions of treatment could be used to predict displacement patterns for individual patients. CONCLUSION: Intra-fraction motion of the prostate gland appears to be a limiting factor when considering margins for radiotherapy. Given the variation between patients, a uniform set of margins for all patients may not be satisfactory when high target doses are to be delivered. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To determine intra-fraction displacement of the prostate gland from imaging pre- and post-radiotherapy delivery of prostate cancerpatients with three implanted fiducial markers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were collected from 184 patients who had two orthogonal X-rays pre- and post-delivery on at least 20 occasions using a Varian On Board kV Imaging system. A total of 5778 image pairs covering time intervals between 3 and 30 min between pre- and post-imaging were evaluated for intra-fraction prostate displacement. RESULTS: The mean three dimensional vector shift between images was 1.7 mm ranging from 0 to 25 mm. No preferential direction of displacement was found; however, there was an increase of prostate displacement with time between images. There was a large variation in typical shifts between patients (range 1 +/- 1 to 6 +/- 2 mm) with no apparent trends throughout the treatment course. Images acquired in the first five fractions of treatment could be used to predict displacement patterns for individual patients. CONCLUSION: Intra-fraction motion of the prostate gland appears to be a limiting factor when considering margins for radiotherapy. Given the variation between patients, a uniform set of margins for all patients may not be satisfactory when high target doses are to be delivered. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Maria Antico; Peter Prinsen; Francesco Cellini; Alice Fracassi; Alfonso A Isola; David Cobben; Davide Fontanarosa Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Adam Gladwish; Geordi Pang; Patrick Cheung; Laura D'Alimonte; Andrea Deabreu; Andrew Loblaw Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Richard Oates; Suki Gill; Farshad Foroudi; Michael Lim Joon; Michal Schneider; Mathias Bressel; Tomas Kron Journal: J Med Phys Date: 2015 Jan-Mar
Authors: Prabhjot Juneja; Andrew Kneebone; Jeremy T Booth; David I Thwaites; Ramandeep Kaur; Emma Colvill; Jin A Ng; Paul J Keall; Thomas Eade Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 3.481