Literature DB >> 31810236

Comparison between Conventional IMRT Planning and a Novel Real-Time Adaptive Planning Strategy in Hypofractionated Regimes for Prostate Cancer: A Proof-of-Concept Planning Study.

Maria Antico1,2,3,4, Peter Prinsen1, Alice Fracassi1,5, Alfonso Isola1, David Cobben6,7,8, Davide Fontanarosa3,9.   

Abstract

In prostate cancer external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), intra-fraction prostate drifts may compromise the treatment efficacy by underdosing the target and/or overdosing the organs at risk. In this study, a recently developed real-time adaptive planning strategy for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer was evaluated in hypofractionated regimes against traditional treatment planning based on a treatment volume margin expansion. The proposed workflow makes use of a "library of plans" corresponding to possible intra-fraction prostate positions. During delivery, at each beam end, the plan prepared for the position of the prostate closest to the current one is selected and the corresponding beam delivered. This adaptive planning strategy was compared with the traditional approach on a clinical prostate cancer case where different prostate shift magnitudes were considered. Five, six and fifteen fraction hypofractionated schemes were considered for each of these scenarios. When shifts larger than the treatment margin were present, using the traditional approach the seminal vesicles were underdosed by 3-4% of the prescribed dose. The adaptive approach instead allowed for correct target dose coverage and lowered the dose on the rectum for each dosimetric endpoint on average by 3-4% in all the fractionation schemes. Standard intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning did not always guarantee a correct dose distribution on the seminal vesicles and the rectum. The adaptive planning strategy proposed resulted insensitive to the intra-fraction prostate drifts, produced a dose distribution in agreement with the dosimetric requirements in every case analysed and significantly lowered the dose on the rectum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive rt; hypofractionation; intra-fraction motion; margin; prostate cancer; radiotherapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31810236      PMCID: PMC6956044          DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7040153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  23 in total

1.  Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mark Foskey; Brad Davis; Lav Goyal; Sha Chang; Ed Chaney; Nathalie Strehl; Sandrine Tomei; Julian Rosenman; Sarang Joshi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Intra-fraction prostate displacement in radiotherapy estimated from pre- and post-treatment imaging of patients with implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  Tomas Kron; Jessica Thomas; Chris Fox; Ann Thompson; Rebecca Owen; Alan Herschtal; Annette Haworth; Keen-Hun Tai; Farshad Foroudi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Late rectal and bladder toxicity following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Predictive factors and treatment results.

Authors:  Rafael Fuentes-Raspall; José Maria Inoriza; Alvaro Rosello-Serrano; Carmen Auñón-Sanz; Pilar Garcia-Martin; Gemma Oliu-Isern
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-06-21

4.  Prostate intrafraction motion assessed by simultaneous kilovoltage fluoroscopy at megavoltage delivery I: clinical observations and pattern analysis.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Clinical impact of margin reduction on late toxicity and short-term biochemical control for patients treated with daily on-line image guided IMRT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gilles Crehange; Celine Mirjolet; Melanie Gauthier; Etienne Martin; Gilles Truc; Karine Peignaux-Casasnovas; Caroline Azelie; Franck Bonnetain; Suzanne Naudy; Philippe Maingon
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Intra-fraction motion of the prostate is a random walk.

Authors:  H Ballhausen; M Li; N-S Hegemann; U Ganswindt; C Belka
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Observations on real-time prostate gland motion using electromagnetic tracking.

Authors:  Katja M Langen; Twyla R Willoughby; Sanford L Meeks; Anand Santhanam; Alexis Cunningham; Lisa Levine; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  On cold spots in tumor subvolumes.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Tomé; Jack F Fowler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  Alexis N T J Kotte; Pieter Hofman; Jan J W Lagendijk; Marco van Vulpen; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Nomogram to predict rectal toxicity following prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jean-Bernard Delobel; Khemara Gnep; Juan David Ospina; Véronique Beckendorf; Ciprian Chira; Jian Zhu; Alberto Bossi; Taha Messai; Oscar Acosta; Joël Castelli; Renaud de Crevoisier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adaptive radiation therapy strategies in the treatment of prostate cancer patients using hypofractionated VMAT.

Authors:  Pawel Siciarz; Boyd McCurdy; Nikesh Hanumanthappa; Eric Van Uytven
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.