Literature DB >> 30211031

Analysis of geometric variation of neck node levels during image-guided radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: recommended planning margins.

Wenyong Tan1,2,3, Yingjie Wang4, Ming Yang2,5, Richard A Amos6, Weihao Li2, Jianzeng Ye2, Royle Gary6, Weixi Shen1, Desheng Hu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To quantify the geometrical changes of each neck nodal level (NNL) and estimate the geometric planning target volume (PTV) margin during image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).
METHODS: Twenty patients with locally advanced NPC underwent one planning computed tomography (CTplan) and 6 weekly repeat CT (CTrep) scans during chemoradiotherapy. Each CTrep was rigidly registered to the CTplan. All the NNLs were manually delineated in each transverse CT section. When comparing the NNL in CTrep with CTplan, their volumes, displacement of the center of the mass, and the shortest perpendicular distance (SPD) were automatically calculated. This was followed by calculation of the systematic and random errors, overlapping index (OI), and dice similarity coefficient (DSC). With PTVs isotropically expanded from NNL by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm, they were compared with NNL itself; OI >0.95 was defined as the acceptable geometrical coverage. The Mann-Whitney test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: All volumes, OI, and DSC of the NNLs (not including level IA) showed a linear decrease over time throughout the treatment course. The volume of NNLs decreased by 1-6% in the first week and 10-21% in the sixth week. The mean SPD was 1.3-1.7 and 1.9-3.5 mm in the first and sixth week respectively. The DSCs for nodal level IB, II, III, and IV were >0.7 and that of level V was <0.7 throughout the treatment course. For level IA and VI, DSC was <0.7 after the 2nd week. To maintain the OI >0.95, 2-5 mm was needed to expand the different NNLs.
CONCLUSIONS: The geometrical changes of each NNL are substantial and the necessary margin of 2-5 mm depended on individual NNL is needed to maintain geometrical coverage throughout the course of IGRT for NPC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; adaptive radiotherapy; geometrical changes; radiation therapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30211031      PMCID: PMC6127525          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2018.08.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  31 in total

1.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Peter Levendag; Kian K Ang; Jacques Bernier; Marijel Braaksma; Volker Budach; Cliff Chao; Emmanuel Coche; Jay S Cooper; Guy Cosnard; Avraham Eisbruch; Samy El-Sayed; Bahman Emami; Cai Grau; Marc Hamoir; Nancy Lee; Philippe Maingon; Karin Muller; Hervé Reychler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  Current progress in adaptive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  David L Schwartz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Intra-fraction prostate displacement in radiotherapy estimated from pre- and post-treatment imaging of patients with implanted fiducial markers.

Authors:  Tomas Kron; Jessica Thomas; Chris Fox; Ann Thompson; Rebecca Owen; Alan Herschtal; Annette Haworth; Keen-Hun Tai; Farshad Foroudi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 4.  Identifying patients who may benefit from adaptive radiotherapy: Does the literature on anatomic and dosimetric changes in head and neck organs at risk during radiotherapy provide information to help?

Authors:  Charlotte L Brouwer; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Johannes A Langendijk; Nanna M Sijtsema
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Adaptive radiation therapy in head and neck cancer for clinical practice: state of the art and practical challenges.

Authors:  Ovidiu Veresezan; Idriss Troussier; Alexis Lacout; Sarah Kreps; Sophie Maillard; Aude Toulemonde; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Florence Huguet; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Comprehensive treatment of squamous cell cancer of head and neck: Chinese expert consensus 2013.

Authors:  Jinyi Lang; Li Gao; Ye Guo; Chong Zhao; Chenping Zhang
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Assessment by a deformable registration method of the volumetric and positional changes of target volumes and organs at risk in pharyngo-laryngeal tumors treated with concomitant chemo-radiation.

Authors:  Pierre Castadot; Xavier Geets; John Aldo Lee; Nicolas Christian; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  The tumor shape changes of nasopharyngeal cancer during chemoradiotherapy: the estimated margin to cover the geometrical variation.

Authors:  Wenyong Tan; Jianzeng Ye; Ruilian Xu; Xianming Li; Wan He; Xiaohong Wang; Yanping Li; Desheng Hu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

9.  Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jiqing Su; Wen Chen; Huiyun Yang; Jidong Hong; Zijian Zhang; Guangzheng Yang; Li Li; Rui Wei
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Target volume and position variations during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenyong Tan; Yanping Li; Guang Han; Jiaozhen Xu; Xiaohong Wang; Ying Li; Desheng Hu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Howard E Morgan; David J Sher
Journal:  Cancers Head Neck       Date:  2020-01-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.