Literature DB >> 20188344

Female-to-male breeding ratio in modern humans-an analysis based on historical recombinations.

Damian Labuda1, Jean-François Lefebvre, Philippe Nadeau, Marie-Hélène Roy-Gagnon.   

Abstract

Was the past genetic contribution of women and men to the current human population equal? Was polygyny (excess of breeding women) present among hominid lineages? We addressed these questions by measuring the ratio of population recombination rates between the X chromosome and the autosomes, rho(X)/rho(A). The X chromosome recombines only in female meiosis, whereas autosomes undergo crossovers in both sexes; thus, rho(X)/rho(A) reflects the female-to-male breeding ratio, beta. We estimated beta from rho(X)/rho(A) inferred from genomic diversity data and calibrated with recombination rates derived from pedigree data. For the HapMap populations, we obtained beta of 1.4 in the Yoruba from West Africa, 1.3 in Europeans, and 1.1 in East Asian samples. These values are consistent with a high prevalence of monogamy and limited polygyny in human populations. More mutations occur during male meiosis as compared to female meiosis at the rate ratio referred to as alpha. We show that at alpha not equal 1, the divergence rates and genetic diversities of the X chromosome relative to the autosomes are complex functions of both alpha and beta, making their independent estimation difficult. Because our estimator of beta does not require any knowledge of the mutation rates, our approach should allow us to dissociate the effects of alpha and beta on the genetic diversity and divergence rate ratios of the sex chromosomes to the autosomes. Copyright 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188344      PMCID: PMC2833377          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  56 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Haplotypes in the dystrophin DNA segment point to a mosaic origin of modern human diversity.

Authors:  Ewa Zietkiewicz; Vania Yotova; Dominik Gehl; Tina Wambach; Isabel Arrieta; Mark Batzer; David E C Cole; Peter Hechtman; Feige Kaplan; David Modiano; Jean-Paul Moisan; Roman Michalski; Damian Labuda
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Gilean A T McVean
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity.

Authors:  John E Pool; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Fraction of informative recombinations: a heuristic approach to analyze recombination rates.

Authors:  J-F Lefebvre; D Labuda
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Strong and weak male mutation bias at different sites in the primate genomes: insights from the human-chimpanzee comparison.

Authors:  James Taylor; Svitlana Tyekucheva; Michael Zody; Francesca Chiaromonte; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Estimation of hominoid ancestral population sizes under bayesian coalescent models incorporating mutation rate variation and sequencing errors.

Authors:  Ralph Burgess; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Evaluating signatures of sex-specific processes in the human genome.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Sohini Ramachandran
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  16 in total

1.  Can a sex-biased human demography account for the reduced effective population size of chromosome X in non-Africans?

Authors:  Alon Keinan; David Reich
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Mapping genes that predict treatment outcome in admixed populations.

Authors:  T M Baye; R A Wilke
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.550

3.  Sex-averaged recombination and mutation rates on the X chromosome: a comment on Labuda et al.

Authors:  Kirk E Lohmueller; Jeremiah D Degenhardt; Alon Keinan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Estimators of the human effective sex ratio detect sex biases on different timescales.

Authors:  Leslie S Emery; Joseph Felsenstein; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness of a Multinational Sample of Consensually Non-Monogamous Adults with Those of the U.S. General Population: Additional Comparisons by Gender, Number of Sexual Partners, Frequency of Sex, and Marital Status.

Authors:  Derrell W Cox; James R Fleckenstein; Lori R Sims-Cox
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-08

6.  Contrasting X-linked and autosomal diversity across 14 human populations.

Authors:  Leonardo Arbiza; Srikanth Gottipati; Adam Siepel; Alon Keinan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A resolution of the mutation load paradox in humans.

Authors:  Yann Lesecque; Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Beyond 2/3 and 1/3: The Complex Signatures of Sex-Biased Admixture on the X Chromosome.

Authors:  Amy Goldberg; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Natural selection reduced diversity on human y chromosomes.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Kirk E Lohmueller; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  X-linked MTMR8 diversity and evolutionary history of sub-Saharan populations.

Authors:  Damian Labuda; Vania Yotova; Jean-François Lefebvre; Claudia Moreau; Gerd Utermann; Scott M Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.