Literature DB >> 34105057

Comparing the Self-Reported Health, Happiness, and Marital Happiness of a Multinational Sample of Consensually Non-Monogamous Adults with Those of the U.S. General Population: Additional Comparisons by Gender, Number of Sexual Partners, Frequency of Sex, and Marital Status.

Derrell W Cox1, James R Fleckenstein2, Lori R Sims-Cox3.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this cross-sectional study was to examine the associations of self-reported health, happiness, marital happiness, frequency of sexual activity, and number of partners from a multinational survey of individuals who are consensually non-monogamous (CNM) or open to being CNM, completed in 2012 with 4062 respondents. We compared data from this survey with the 2010-2014 US General Social Surveys (GSS). This study explored these variables and their predictors by gender (including 612 non-binary-gendered CNM individuals), marital status, number of partners, sexual frequency, age, education, and income and were broken down by behavioral sexual orientation, marital status, and other relevant categories. Respondents in our CNM sample generally reported being as healthy (sometimes healthier; e.g., all respondents M-W Z = 7.66, p < .001, η2 = 0.007), happy (frequently happier; e.g., multiple-partnered Z = 15.43, p < .001, η2 = 0.069), happy in their marriages (in some cases happier; e.g., multiple-partnered females Z = 2.61, p = .009, η2 = 0.067), and reported having more frequent sexual activity (e.g., all Z = 29.54, p < .001, η2 = 0.094) with more partners (e.g., all Z = 60.75, p < .001, η2 = 0.393) compared to corresponding individuals within the GSS. This study contributes to knowledge about commonalities and differences between the general population and those who are CNM regarding health, happiness, and happiness in marriage, including differences in optimal number of sexual partners and sexual frequency.

Keywords:  Consensual non-monogamy; Happiness; Health; Marital happiness; Sexual frequency; Sexual partners

Year:  2021        PMID: 34105057     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-01973-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  41 in total

1.  Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?

Authors:  David G Blanchflower; Andrew J Oswald
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love.

Authors:  C S Carter
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 3.  Re-examining the effectiveness of monogamy as an STI-preventive strategy.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Jes L Matsick; Amy C Moors; Ali Ziegler; Jennifer D Rubin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Investigation of Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships.

Authors:  Terri Conley; Jessica Matsick; Amy Catherine Moors; Ali Ziegler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-03

Review 5.  A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Ali Ziegler; Amy C Moors; Jes L Matsick; Brandon Valentine
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-11-21

Review 6.  Positive sexuality and its impact on overall well-being.

Authors:  R M Anderson
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love.

Authors:  Andreas Bartels; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Condom use errors among sexually unfaithful and consensually nonmonogamous individuals.

Authors:  Terri D Conley; Amy C Moors; Ali Ziegler; Jes L Matsick; Jennifer D Rubin
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.706

9.  Sexual frequency and salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA).

Authors:  Carl J Charnetski; Francis X Brennan
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2004-06

10.  Bateman's principles and human sex roles.

Authors:  Gillian R Brown; Kevin N Laland; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 17.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.