Literature DB >> 20187187

The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data.

Marieke Heisen1, Xiaobing Fan, Johannes Buurman, Natal A W van Riel, Gregory S Karczmar, Bart M ter Haar Romeny.   

Abstract

We investigated the influence of the temporal resolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation. Dynamic Gd-DTPA (Gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid) enhanced MRI data of implanted prostate tumors on rat hind limb were acquired at 4.7 T, with a temporal resolution of approximately 5 sec. The data were subsequently downsampled to temporal resolutions in the range of 15 sec to 85 sec, using a strategy that involves a recombination of k-space data. A basic two-compartment model was fit to the contrast agent uptake curves. The results demonstrated that as temporal resolution decreases, the volume transfer constant (K(trans)) is progressively underestimated (approximately 4% to approximately 25%), and the fractional extravascular extracellular space (v(e)) is progressively overestimated (approximately 1% to approximately 10%). The proposed downsampling strategy simulates the influence of temporal resolution more realistically than simply downsampling by removing samples. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20187187      PMCID: PMC3076555          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  16 in total

1.  Chemical shift imaging at 4.7 tesla of thymus in young and old mice.

Authors:  P Marzola; E Mocchegiani; E Nicolato; A Tibaldi; A Sbarbati; F Osculati
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI.

Authors:  David L Buckley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging reveals stress-induced angiogenesis in MCF7 human breast tumors.

Authors:  E Furman-Haran; R Margalit; D Grobgeld; H Degani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas.

Authors:  Judith U Harrer; Geoff J M Parker; Hamied A Haroon; David L Buckley; Karl Embelton; Caleb Roberts; Danielle Balériaux; Alan Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.

Authors:  E Henderson; B K Rutt; T Y Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues.

Authors:  D A Kovar; M Lewis; G S Karczmar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Greg Karczmar; Cheng Yang; James Dignam; Thomas F Gajewski; Hedy Kindler; Everett Vokes; Peter MacEneany; Myrosia T Mitchell; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  28 in total

1.  A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings.

Authors:  Luminita A Tudorica; Karen Y Oh; Nicole Roy; Mark D Kettler; Yiyi Chen; Stephanie L Hemmingson; Aneela Afzal; John W Grinstead; Gerhard Laub; Xin Li; Wei Huang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Quantitative DCE-MRI for prediction of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: the impact of breast cancer subtypes on the diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Stylianos Drisis; Thierry Metens; Michael Ignatiadis; Konstantinos Stathopoulos; Shih-Li Chao; Marc Lemort
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Biopsy targeting with dynamic contrast-enhanced versus standard neuronavigation MRI in glioma: a prospective double-blinded evaluation of selection benefits.

Authors:  Vera C Keil; Bogdan Pintea; Gerrit H Gielen; Susanne Greschus; Rolf Fimmers; Jürgen Gieseke; Matthias Simon; Hans H Schild; Dariusch R Hadizadeh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xin Li; Yiyi Chen; Xia Li; Ming-Ching Chang; Matthew J Oborski; Dariya I Malyarenko; Mark Muzi; Guido H Jajamovich; Andriy Fedorov; Alina Tudorica; Sandeep N Gupta; Charles M Laymon; Kenneth I Marro; Hadrien A Dyvorne; James V Miller; Daniel P Barbodiak; Thomas L Chenevert; Thomas E Yankeelov; James M Mountz; Paul E Kinahan; Ron Kikinis; Bachir Taouli; Fiona Fennessy; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 5.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Bolus arrival time and its effect on tissue characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alireza Mehrtash; Sandeep N Gupta; Dattesh Shanbhag; James V Miller; Tina Kapur; Fiona M Fennessy; Ron Kikinis; Andriy Fedorov
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Accelerated Brain DCE-MRI Using Iterative Reconstruction With Total Generalized Variation Penalty for Quantitative Pharmacokinetic Analysis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Chunhao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; John P Kirkpatrick; Zheng Chang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-05-23

8.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: An intraindividual assessment of the effect of temporal resolution on qualitative detection and quantitative analysis of histopathologically proven prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin M Ream; Ankur M Doshi; Diane Dunst; Nainesh Parikh; Max X Kong; James S Babb; Samir S Taneja; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  A reference agent model for DCE MRI can be used to quantify the relative vascular permeability of two MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Julio Cárdenas-Rodríguez; Christine M Howison; Terry O Matsunaga; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the accurate, extensive quantification of microvascular permeability in atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Claudia Calcagno; Mark E Lobatto; Hadrien Dyvorne; Philip M Robson; Antoine Millon; Max L Senders; Olivier Lairez; Sarayu Ramachandran; Bram F Coolen; Alexandra Black; Willem J M Mulder; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.