N J Curtis1,2, J Davids1, J D Foster1,2, N K Francis3,4. 1. Clinical Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK. 2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London, UK. 3. Clinical Research Unit, Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK. Nader.francis@ydh.nhs.uk. 4. Faculty of Science, University of Bath, Wessex House 3.22, Bath, Somerset, UK. Nader.francis@ydh.nhs.uk.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. AIM: To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. RESULTS: A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. CONCLUSION: Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown. AIM: To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs. RESULTS: A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool. CONCLUSION: Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.
Authors: Sheraz R Markar; Tom Wiggins; Melody Ni; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Jan B Van Lanschot; Mitsuru Sasako; George B Hanna Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-12-29 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Aaron S Rickles; David W Dietz; George J Chang; Steven D Wexner; Mariana E Berho; Feza H Remzi; Frederick L Greene; James W Fleshman; Maher A Abbas; Walter Peters; Katia Noyes; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J D Foster; P Ewings; S Falk; E J Cooper; H Roach; N P West; B A Williams-Yesson; G B Hanna; N K Francis Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Gianpiero Gravante; David Hemingway; James Andrew Stephenson; David Sharpe; Ahmed Osman; Melissa Haines; Vafa Pirjamali; Roberto Sorge; Justin Ming Yeung; Michael Norwood; Andrew Miller; Kirsten Boyle Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Charlotte L Deijen; Simone Velthuis; Alice Tsai; Stella Mavroveli; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Colin Sietses; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Antonio M Lacy; George B Hanna; H Jaap Bonjer Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Nathan J Curtis; Jake D Foster; Danilo Miskovic; Chris S B Brown; Peter J Hewett; Sarah Abbott; George B Hanna; Andrew R L Stevenson; Nader K Francis Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 14.766