Literature DB >> 16446987

Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons.

S K Sarker1, R Hutchinson, A Chang, C Vincent, A W Darzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of technical skill is notoriously difficult because of the subjectivity and time-consuming expert analysis. No ongoing evaluation scheme exists to assess the continuing competency of surgeons. This study examined whether surgeons' self-assessment accurately reflects their actual surgical technique.
METHODS: Hierarchical task analysis (HTA) of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was constructed. Ten expert surgeons were asked to modify the HTA for their own technique. The HTAs of these surgeons then were compared with their actual operations, which had been recorded and assessed by two observers.
RESULTS: A total of 40 operations were assessed. All the gallbladders subjected to surgery were classified as grades 1 to 3. The mean interrater reliability for the two observers had a k value of 0.84 (p < 0.05), and the mean intrarater reliability between surgeons and observers had a k value of 0.79 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons' self-evaluation is accurate for technical skills aspects of their operations. This study demonstrates that self-appraisal using HTA is feasible, accurate, and practical. The authors aim to increase the numbers in their study and also to recruit residents.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16446987     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0312-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  N Y Mehta; R S Haluck; M I Frecker; A J Snyder
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Yaron Munz; Sudip K Sarker; Ara Darzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-01

3.  Comparison of bench test evaluations of surgical skill with live operating performance assessments.

Authors:  Vivek Datta; Simon Bann; Jonathan Beard; Mirren Mandalia; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Technical skills errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by expert surgeons.

Authors:  S K Sarker; A Chang; C Vincent; A W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Charles Vincent; Sir Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Human reliability assessment in surgery--a new approach for improving surgical performance and clinical outcome.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery.

Authors:  R Malik; P S White; C J Macewen
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2003-10

10.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Are general surgeons able to accurately self-assess their level of technical skills?

Authors:  C Rizan; J Ansell; T W Tilston; N Warren; J Torkington
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Constructing hierarchical task analysis in surgery.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Tark Albrani; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Assessing operative performance in advanced laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Isis Kumar; Conor Delaney
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hierarchical task analysis for identification of interrelationships between ergonomic, external disruption, and internal disruption in complex laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Ming Wang; Jiaquan Xiao; Dennis Gyomber; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Jaisa S Olasky; Souheil Adra; Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Dissecting Cardiac Surgery: A Video-based Recall Protocol to Elucidate Team Cognitive Processes in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Roger D Dias; Marco A Zenati; Heather M Conboy; Lori A Clarke; Leon J Osterweil; George S Avrunin; Steven J Yule
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Self versus external assessment for technical tasks in surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Boris Zevin
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-12

9.  Technical and technological skills assessment in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Charles Vincent
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Time-action analysis (TAA) of the surgical technique implanting the collum femoris preserving (CFP) hip arthroplasty. TAASTIC trial identifying pitfalls during the learning curve of surgeons participating in a subsequent randomized controlled trial (an observational study).

Authors:  Jakob van Oldenrijk; Matthias U Schafroth; Mohit Bhandari; Wouter C Runne; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.