Literature DB >> 20182006

The influence of CT image noise on proton range calculation in radiotherapy planning.

Alexei V Chvetsov1, Sandra L Paige.   

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to evaluate the relationship between the stochastic errors in CT numbers and the standard deviation of the computed proton beam range in radiotherapy planning. The stochastic voxel-to-voxel variation in CT numbers called 'noise,' may be due to signal registration, processing and numerical image reconstruction technique. Noise in CT images may cause a deviation in the computed proton range from the physical proton range, even assuming that the error due to CT number-stopping power calibration is removed. To obtain the probability density function (PDF) of the computed proton range, we have used the continuing slowing down approximation (CSDA) and the uncorrelated white Gaussian noise along the proton path. The model of white noise was accepted because for the slice-based fan-beam CT scanner; the power-spectrum properties apply only to the axial (x, y) domain and the noise is uncorrelated in the z domain. However, the possible influence of the noise power spectrum on the standard deviation of the range should be investigated in the future. A random number generator was utilized for noise simulation and this procedure was iteratively repeated to obtain convergence of range PDF, which approached a Gaussian distribution. We showed that the standard deviation of the range, sigma, increases linearly with the initial proton energy, computational grid size and standard deviation of the voxel values. The 95% confidence interval width of the range PDF, which is defined as 4sigma, may reach 0.6 cm for the initial proton energy of 200 MeV, computational grid 0.25 cm and 5% standard deviation of CT voxel values. Our results show that the range uncertainty due to random errors in CT numbers may be significant and comparable to the uncertainties due to calibration of CT numbers.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182006     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/6/N01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Does kV-MV dual-energy computed tomography have an advantage in determining proton stopping power ratios in patients?

Authors:  M Yang; G Virshup; J Clayton; X R Zhu; R Mohan; L Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.

Authors:  Hugh H C Lee; Bin Li; Xinhui Duan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Ming Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy.

Authors:  Ruirui Liu; Baozhou Sun; Tiezhi Zhang; Jeffery F Williamson; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Tianyu Zhao
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Darren M C Poon; Stephen Wu; Leon Ho; Kin Yin Cheung; Ben Yu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Compensation method for respiratory motion in proton treatment planning for mobile liver cancer.

Authors:  Hojin Jeong; Se Byeong Lee; Seung Hoon Yoo; Young Kyung Lim; Tae Hyun Kim; Seyjoon Park; Gyu Young Chai; Ki Mun Kang; Dongho Shin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A New Method to Reconstruct in 3D the Emission Position of the Prompt Gamma Rays following Proton Beam Irradiation.

Authors:  Costanza M V Panaino; Ranald I Mackay; Karen J Kirkby; Michael J Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.