Literature DB >> 20181117

Male and female meiotic behaviour of an intrachromosomal insertion determined by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Leoni Xanthopoulou1, Anna Mantzouratou, Anastasia Mania, Suzanne Cawood, Alpesh Doshi, Domenico M Ranieri, Joy Da Delhanty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two related family members, a female and a male balanced carrier of an intrachromosomal insertion on chromosome 7 were referred to our centre for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This presented a rare opportunity to investigate the behaviour of the insertion chromosome during meiosis in two related carriers. The aim of this study was to carry out a detailed genetic analysis of the preimplantation embryos that were generated from the three treatment cycles for the male and two for the female carrier.Patients underwent in vitro fertilization and on day 3, 22 embryos from the female carrier and 19 embryos from the male carrier were biopsied and cells analysed by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Follow up analysis of 29 untransferred embryos was also performed for confirmation of the diagnosis and to obtain information on meiotic and mitotic outcome.
RESULTS: In this study, the female carrier produced more than twice as many chromosomally balanced embryos as the male (76.5% vs. 36%), and two pregnancies were achieved for her. Follow up analysis showed that the male carrier had produced more highly abnormal embryos than the female (25% and 15% respectively) and no pregnancies occurred for the male carrier and his partner.
CONCLUSION: This study compares how an intrachromosomal insertion has behaved in the meiotic and preimplantation stages of development in sibling male and female carriers. It confirms that PGD is an appropriate treatment in such cases. Reasons for the differing outcome for the two carriers are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181117      PMCID: PMC2830219          DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-3-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cytogenet        ISSN: 1755-8166            Impact factor:   2.009


  38 in total

1.  Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  L Voullaire; H Slater; R Williamson; L Wilton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Highly abnormal cleavage divisions in preimplantation embryos from translocation carriers.

Authors:  E Iwarsson; H Malmgren; J Inzunza; L Ahrlund-Richter; P Sjöblom; B Rosenlund; M Fridström; O Hovatta; M Nordenskjöld; E Blennow
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Tomas Escudero; Carmen Márquez; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Meiotic outcomes in reciprocal translocation carriers ascertained in 3-day human embryos.

Authors:  Caroline Mackie Ogilvie; Paul N Scriven
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Sex matters in meiosis.

Authors:  Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for an insertional translocation carrier.

Authors:  C Melotte; S Debrock; T D'Hooghe; J P Fryns; J R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells.

Authors:  C Tease; M A Hultén
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 8.  The origin of genetic defects in the human and their detection in the preimplantation embryo.

Authors:  J D Delhanty; A H Handyside
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome.

Authors:  Magdalena Bielanska; Seang Lin Tan; Asangla Ao
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Interchromosomal insertions. Identification of five cases and a review.

Authors:  J O Van Hemel; H J Eussen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.