Literature DB >> 15467366

Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells.

C Tease1, M A Hultén.   

Abstract

Meiotic chromosomes in human oocytes are packaged differently than in spermatocytes at the pachytene stage of meiosis I, when crossing-over takes place. Thus the meiosis-specific pairing structure, the synaptonemal complex (SC), is considerably longer in oocytes in comparison to spermatocytes. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of this length factor on meiotic recombination in male and female human germ cells. The positions of crossovers were identified by the DNA mismatch repair protein MLH1. Spermatocytes have approximately 50 crossovers per cell in comparison to more than 70 in oocytes. Analyses of inter-crossover distances (and presumptively crossover interference) along SCs suggested that while there might be inter-individual variation, there was no consistent difference between sexes. Thus the higher rate of recombination in human oocytes is not a consequence of more closely spaced crossovers along the SCs. The rate of recombination per unit length of SC is higher in spermatocytes than oocytes. However, when the so-called obligate chiasma is excluded from the analysis, then the rates of recombination per unit length of SC are essentially identical in the two sexes. Our analyses indicate that the inter-sex difference in recombination is largely a consequence of the difference in meiotic chromosome architecture in the two sexes. We propose that SC length per se, and therefore the size of the physical platform for crossing-over (and not the DNA content) is the principal factor determining the difference in rate of recombination in male and female germ cells. A preliminary investigation of SC loop size by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) indicated loops may be shorter in oocytes than in spermatocytes. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467366     DOI: 10.1159/000080599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  54 in total

1.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of the genomic recombination rate in murid rodents.

Authors:  Beth L Dumont; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Pairing, connecting, exchanging, pausing and pulling chromosomes.

Authors:  Alex McDougall; David J Elliott; Neil Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Sex, not genotype, determines recombination levels in mice.

Authors:  Audrey Lynn; Stefanie Schrump; Jonathan Cherry; Terry Hassold; Patricia Hunt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Meiotic synapsis proceeds from a limited number of subtelomeric sites in the human male.

Authors:  Petrice W Brown; Luann Judis; E Ricky Chan; Stuart Schwartz; Allen Seftel; Anthony Thomas; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Inefficient Crossover Maturation Underlies Elevated Aneuploidy in Human Female Meiosis.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Terry Hassold; Patricia Hunt; Martin A White; Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex.

Authors:  Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis.

Authors:  Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  A genetic linkage map for the saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus).

Authors:  Lee G Miles; Sally R Isberg; Travis C Glenn; Stacey L Lance; Pauline Dalzell; Peter C Thomson; Chris Moran
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.