Literature DB >> 10746563

Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization.

L Voullaire1, H Slater, R Williamson, L Wilton.   

Abstract

Karyotypic studies of aborted fetuses have been used to draw the inference that the proportion of conceptuses with chromosome abnormalities is very high. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) studies of blastomeres from early cleavage embryos have provided some support for this inference but they are limited to the study of a few chromosomes. We describe the novel application of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to the study of numerical and structural abnormalities of single blastomeres from disaggregated 3-day-old human embryos. CGH results were obtained for 63 blastomeres from 12 embryos. Identification of all chromosomes with the exception of chromosomes 17, 19, 20 and 22 was possible. The embryos divided into four groups: (1) embryos with a normal CGH karyotype seen in all blastomeres; (2) embryos with consistent aneuploidy suggesting meiotic non-disjunction had occurred; (3) embryos that were mosaic generally with one or more cells showing aneuploidy for one or two chromosomes but some with cells showing extensive aneuploidy; and (4) one embryo with extensive aneuploidy in all blastomeres. The extensive aneuploidy in group 4 is interpreted as corresponding to the random aneuploidy seen in "chaotic" embryos reported by using interphase FISH. Partial chromosome loss and gain following chromosome breakage was observed in one embryo. Our analysis provides basic biological information on the occurrence of constitutional and post-zygotic chromosome abnormalities in early human embryos. Used in conjunction with embryo biopsy, diagnostic CGH should allow the exclusion of a proportion of embryos that appear normal but that have a poor probability of survival and, therefore, may improve the implantation rate after in vitro fertilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10746563     DOI: 10.1007/s004390051030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  58 in total

Review 1.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Chromosomal variation in neurons of the developing and adult mammalian nervous system.

Authors:  S K Rehen; M J McConnell; D Kaushal; M A Kingsbury; A H Yang; J Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of sperm DNA apoptosis after exposure to heat shock.

Authors:  Sylvia L Mann; William C Patton; Alan King; Philip J Chan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Is there any evidence for immunologically mediated or immunologically modifiable early pregnancy failure?

Authors:  David A Clark
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Singling out genetic disorders and disease.

Authors:  Martine De Rycke
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 6.  Embryonic death and the creation of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Donald W Landry; Howard A Zucker
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Aneuploid neurons are functionally active and integrated into brain circuitry.

Authors:  M A Kingsbury; B Friedman; M J McConnell; S K Rehen; A H Yang; D Kaushal; J Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.