| Literature DB >> 20180716 |
Lutz A Mueller1, Tobias E Nowak, Lothar Haeberle, Lars P Mueller, Alexander Kress, Michael Voelk, David Pfander, Raimund Forst, Rainer Schmidt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aseptic implant loosening and periprosthetic bone loss are major problems after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We present an in vivo method of computed tomography (CT) assisted osteodensitometry after THA that differentiates between cortical and cancellous bone density (BD) and area around the femoral component.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20180716 PMCID: PMC2852152 DOI: 10.3109/17453671003635843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop ISSN: 1745-3674 Impact factor: 3.717
Figure 1.Topogram of an uncemented prosthesis with a selection of CT scans. The first scan of the femur was done 2 cm below the tip of the stem (–20 mm) and the most proximal was done at the 100 mm position.
Figure 2.Separate circumferential evaluation of cortical and cancellous BD (mg CaHA/mL) with CT-assisted osteodensitometry (a) compared to the analysis of single zones of interest (dotted lines) in the AP view with DXA (b).
Mean cortical bone density measurements from proximal (position 100 mm) to distal (position –20 mm), postoperatively and at follow-up. The coefficient of variation (precision of measurements) is given for each scan position derived from 5 repeated CT scans of 5 cadavers
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Scan position | ||||||||
| B Coefficient of variation | ||||||||
| C Post-operatively | ||||||||
| D 1 year post-operatively | ||||||||
| E Difference at 1 year (%) | ||||||||
| F p-value at 1 year | ||||||||
| G 6 years post-operatively | ||||||||
| H Difference at 6 years (%) | ||||||||
| I p-value at 6 years | ||||||||
| 100 mm | 1.2% | 891 (77) | 770 (103) | –121 (–14%) | < 0.001 | 649 (92) | –242 (–27%) | < 0.001 |
| 90 mm | 1.0% | 957 (87) | 822 (197) | –135 (–14%) | < 0.001 | 736 (153) | –220 (–23%) | < 0.001 |
| 80 mm | 0.8% | 1,066 (76) | 921 (126) | –145 (–14%) | < 0.001 | 841 (120) | –225 (–21%) | < 0.001 |
| 70 mm | 0.6% | 1,178 (59) | 1,049 (104) | –129 (–11%) | < 0.001 | 989 (106) | –189 (–16%) | < 0.001 |
| 60 mm | 0.6% | 1,210 (74) | 1,119 (88) | –92 (–8%) | 1.0 | 1,066 (111) | –144 (–12%) | < 0.001 |
| 50 mm | 0.9% | 1,230 (63) | 1,154 (97) | –76 (–6%) | 0.1 | 1,095 (86) | –135 (–11%) | < 0.001 |
| 40 mm | 0.5% | 1,242 (62) | 1,161 (90) | –80 (–6%) | 0.1 | 1,120 (79) | –122 (–10%) | < 0.01 |
| 30 mm | 0.7% | 1,245 (61) | 1,166 (84) | –79 (–6%) | 0.2 | 1,140 (73) | –106 (–8%) | 0.03 |
| 20 mm | 0.5% | 1,250 (61) | 1,162 (119) | –87 (–7%) | 0.08 | 1,163 (69) | –87 (–7%) | 0.4 |
| 10 mm | 0.7% | 1,249 (70) | 1,187 (115) | –61 (–5%) | 0.7 | 1,173 (94) | –76 (–6%) | 0.8 |
| 0 mm | 0.5% | 1,246 (80) | 1,204 (123) | –42 (–3%) | 1.0 | 1,201 (92) | –45 (–4%) | 1.0 |
| –10 mm | 0.3% | 1,227 (101) | 1,170 (130) | –57 (–5%) | 0.7 | 1,179 (87) | –48 (–4%) | 1.0 |
| –20 mm | 0.2% | 1,235 (106) | 1,172 (128) | –62 (–5%) | 0.4 | 1,170 (121) | –64 (–5%) | 1.0 |
Contact area measurements (% out of a possible 100% contact area between the prosthesis and the inner cortical bone) from proximal (position 100 mm) to distal (position 0 mm), postoperatively and at follow-up. The coefficient of variation (precision of measurements) is given for each scan position derived from 5 repeated CT scans of 5 cadavers
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A–I: See | ||||||||
| 100 mm | 3.8% | 0.08 (0.08) | 0.09 (0.08) | 0.02 | 1.0 | 0.08 (0.06) | 0.00 | 1.0 |
| 90 mm | 4.4% | 0.10 (0.09) | 0.15 (0.23) | 0.05 | 1.0 | 0.08 (0.06) | –0.02 | 1.0 |
| 80 mm | 3.4% | 0.11 (0.09) | 0.10 (0.08) | –0.01 | 1.0 | 0.08 (0.06) | –0.04 | 1.0 |
| 70 mm | 4.1% | 0.13 (0.11) | 0.16 (0.07) | 0.04 | 1.0 | 0.12 (0.08) | –0.01 | 1.0 |
| 60 mm | 2.7% | 0.18 (0.10) | 0.25 (0.14) | 0.07 | 1.0 | 0.15 (0.13) | –0.03 | 0.4 |
| 50 mm | 2.2% | 0.17 (0.14) | 0.27 (0.16) | 0.09 | 1.0 | 0.14 (0.12) | –0.03 | 1.0 |
| 40 mm | 1.8% | 0.18 (0.15) | 0.21 (0.13) | 0.03 | 1.0 | 0.16 (0.12) | –0.03 | 1.0 |
| 30 mm | 2.9% | 0.18 (0.12) | 0.19 (0.12) | 0.01 | 1.0 | 0.14 (0.10) | –0.04 | 1.0 |
| 20 mm | 2.7% | 0.17 (0.13) | 0.17 (0.10) | 0.00 | 1.0 | 0.15 (0.11) | –0.02 | 1.0 |
| 10 mm | 3.1% | 0.14 (0.09) | 0.24 (0.13) | 0.10 | 0.9 | 0.21 (0.14) | 0.07 | 1.0 |
| 0 mm | 1.5% | 0.10 (0.10) | 0.28 (0.15) | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.28 (0.15) | 0.18 | 0.09 |
Mean cancellous bone density measurements proximally (position 100 mm to 70 mm) and distally (position –10 mm and –20 mm), posoperatively and at follow-up. The coefficient of variation (precision of measurements) is given for each scan position derived from 5 repeated CT scans of 5 cadavers
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A mild but not statistically significant cortical hypertrophy (2–5%) was seen along the entire length of the diaphysis 1 and 6 years after the index operation ( | ||||||||
| A–I: See | ||||||||
| 100 mm | 0.9% | 124 (60) | 104 (63) | –20 (–16%) | 0.07 | 79 (66) | –45 (–36%) | < 0.001 |
| 90 mm | 0.7% | 153 (59) | 132 (62) | –21 (–14%) | 0.09 | 91 (64) | –62 (–41%) | < 0.001 |
| 80 mm | 1.1% | 181 (76) | 148 (68) | –33 (–18%) | < 0.001 | 109 (76) | –72 (–40%) | < 0.001 |
| 70 mm | 1.3% | 208 (94) | 166 (78) | –42 (–20%) | 0.02 | 139 (82) | –69 (–33%) | < 0.001 |
| –10 mm | 0.4% | 36 (52) | 44 (71) | 8 (22%) | 0.04 | 30 (48) | –6 (–17%) | 0.06 |
| –20 mm | 0.3% | 17 (36) | 22 (49) | 5 (29%) | 0.01 | 14 (20) | –3 (–18%) | 0.05 |
Mean measurements of cortical bone area from proximal (position 100 mm) to distal (position –20 mm), postoperatively and at follow-up. The coefficient of variation (precision of measurements) is given for each scan position derived from 5 repeated CT scans of 5 cadavers
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A–I: See | ||||||||
| 100 mm | 2.3% | 1,300 (264) | 1,293 (184) | –7 (–1%) | 1.0 | 1,414 (229) | 114 (9%) | 0.02 |
| 90 mm | 1.5% | 1,055 (212) | 1,078 (187) | 23 (2%) | 1.0 | 1,175 (193) | 120 (11%) | 0.2 |
| 80 mm | 2.5% | 862 (143) | 891 (149) | 29 (3%) | 1.0 | 922 (157) | 60 (7%) | 1.0 |
| 70 mm | 0.9% | 741 (107) | 773 (114) | 32 (4%) | 1.0 | 786 (125) | 46 (6%) | 1.0 |
| 60 mm | 0.8% | 694 (98) | 714 (99) | 20 (3%) | 1.0 | 731 (116) | 37 (5%) | 1.0 |
| 50 mm | 0.4% | 665 (94) | 684 (96) | 19 (3%) | 1.0 | 696 (105) | 31 (5%) | 1.0 |
| 40 mm | 0.7% | 650 (95) | 663 (94) | 13 (2%) | 1.0 | 675 (102) | 25 (4%) | 1.0 |
| 30 mm | 0.6% | 642 (97) | 654 (96) | 11 (2%) | 1.0 | 661 (101) | 19 (3%) | 1.0 |
| 20 mm | 0.6% | 637 (100) | 655 (107) | 18 (3%) | 1.0 | 654 (102) | 17 (3%) | 1.0 |
| 10 mm | 0.4% | 635 (109) | 657 (126) | 22 (3%) | 1.0 | 660 (121) | 25 (4%) | 1.0 |
| 0 mm | 0.4% | 636 (122) | 662 (147) | 26 (4%) | 1.0 | 662 (141) | 26 (4%) | 1.0 |
| –10 mm | 0.1% | 643 (143) | 665 (174) | 21 (3%) | 1.0 | 663 (161) | 19 (3%) | 1.0 |
| –20 mm | 0.1% | 650 (176) | 668 (203) | 18 (3%) | 1.0 | 665 (192) | 15 (2%) | 1.0 |
Mean measurements of cancellous bone area proximally (position 100 mm to 70 mm) and distally (position –10 mm to –20 mm), postoperatively and and at follow-up. The coefficient of variation (precision of measurements) is given for each scan position deriving from five repeated CT-scans of 5 cadavers
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A–I: See | ||||||||
| 100 mm | 1.4% | 910 (194) | 967 (168) | 56 (6%) | 0.2 | 1,055 (174) | 144 (16%) | < 0.01 |
| 90 mm | 1.1% | 674 (162) | 739 (160) | 66 (10%) | 0.8 | 840 (153) | 166 (25%) | < 0.001 |
| 80 mm | 0.5% | 480 (112) | 567 (135) | 87 (18%) | 0.07 | 599 (119) | 118 (25%) | < 0.001 |
| 70 mm | 0.4% | 354 (74) | 421 (78) | 67 (19%) | 0.05 | 440 (100) | 87 (25%) | < 0.001 |
| –10 mm | 0.3% | 191 (105) | 197 (106) | 7 (4%) | 0.7 | 207 (157) | 17 (9%) | 1.0 |
| –20 mm | 0.4% | 201 (137) | 219 (160) | 18 (9%) | 0.9 | 207 (132) | 7 (3%) | 1.0 |