Literature DB >> 10801171

Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty.

S Kobayashi1, N Saito, H Horiuchi, R Iorio, K Takaoka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The principal long-term complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been aseptic fixation failure. Many hip prostheses and operative techniques have been developed to improve outcomes, but few measures have been taken to cope with poor bone quality or hip structure. We assessed risk factors for aseptic fixation failure after THA.
METHODS: We assessed, by multivariate analysis, survival of 405 primary Charnley THAs to identify risk factors for aseptic fixation failures. We also investigated risk factors for development of rapid polyethylene wear (penetration depth of the femoral head into the socket polyethylene > or = 2 mm/year)
FINDINGS: In the entire series of 405 THAs, with use of radiographic fixation failure or revision for a loose socket as the endpoint, development of rapid polyethylene wear and the preoperative diagnosis of atrophic osteoarthrosis (defined by scarce osteophyte formation) were identified as risk factors for socket loosening (p < or = 0.02). A medullary canal with an unfavourable geometry (a stovepipe canal, Noble's canal-flare index < 3.0) was the only risk factor for femoral fixation failure (p < or = 6.7x10(3)). The only variable related to development of rapid polyethylene wear was the type of steel used in the femoral prosthesis--Ortron 90 prostheses significantly lowered the rate of development of rapid wear from 12.7% to 0.4%. In the 248 THAs in which these femoral prostheses were used, socket survival was affected only by the preoperative diagnosis of atrophic osteoarthrosis (for radiographic fixation failure and revision, p=4.0x10(-5) and p=0.042, respectively).
INTERPRETATION: In THA, the critical risk factors are poor bone quality, which manifests as atrophic osteoarthrosis, for socket survival and poor bone structure for femoral-prosthesis survival. To ensure longer durability of THAs, these factors should be assessed further and efforts, especially biological initiatives, should be made to resolve them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10801171     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02164-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  29 in total

1.  Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Aknaksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Cameron Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Influence of stem design on the primary stability of megaprostheses of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Dennis Graage; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jan Nadorf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  CT Lesion Model-Based Structural Allografts: Custom Fabrication and Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Jan Claas Brune; Uwe Hesselbarth; Philipp Seifert; Dimitri Nowack; Rüdiger von Versen; Mark David Smith; Dirk Seifert
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  [Periprosthetic femoral bone reaction after total hip arthroplasty with preservation of the collum femoris : CT-assisted osteodensitometry 1 and 3 years postoperatively].

Authors:  R Schmidt; S Gollwitzer; T E Nowak; M Nowak; L Häberle; A Kress; R Forst; L A Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Kevin J Bozic; Ting Jung Pan; Timothy M Wright; Douglas E Padgett; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Randomised clinical trial assessing migration of uncemented primary total hip replacement stems, with and without autologous impaction bone grafting.

Authors:  Michael Rutherford; Riaz J K Khan; Daniel P Fick; Samantha Haebich; Oscar Nivbrant; Thomas Kozak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years.

Authors:  Carlina V Albanese; Francesco S Santori; Laura Pavan; Ian D Learmonth; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Progressive femoral cortical and cancellous bone density loss after uncemented tapered-design stem fixation.

Authors:  Lutz A Mueller; Tobias E Nowak; Lothar Haeberle; Lars P Mueller; Alexander Kress; Michael Voelk; David Pfander; Raimund Forst; Rainer Schmidt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Minimum ten year results of total hip arthroplasty with the acetabular reinforcement ring in avascular osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Peter P Koch; Moritz Tannast; Hiroshi Fujita; Klaus Siebenrock; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.