Literature DB >> 2017571

Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task.

P L Yee1.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated inhibitory processes in visual spatial attention. In particular, factors influencing the suppression of ignored visual stimuli were investigated. Subjects responded to geometric shapes while distractors were presented in the periphery. Distractors consisted of a single word, a pair of unrelated words, or a single word paired with a string of non-linguistic symbols. Semantic processing of the ignored words was measured with a subsequent lexical decision task. Test probes presented after the prime displays revealed suppression effects for words semantically related to a previously ignored word, but only for conditions in which two distractor words were presented. Suppression was not observed when the prime consisted of a single word or a single word paired with non-linguistic symbols. In Experiment 2 two different time delays between the onset of the primes and the onset of the test probes were used. At the shorter interval facilitatory priming was observed, while at longer intervals suppression was observed. The facilitation-suppression pattern suggests that ignored items are recognized before being suppressed. In summary, the results suggest the following: (1) that selectively attending does not restrict ignored items from gaining access to their semantic representations, and (2) that inhibition is an important process in determining the focus of attention. These results are discussed within a selective attention framework in which all items in a display gain access to memory representations, and attention to selected items causes competing items to be inhibited.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017571     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108401002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  28 in total

1.  The time-course of negative priming: little evidence for episodic trace retrieval.

Authors:  A R Conway
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Deeper processing at target selection increases the magnitude of negative priming.

Authors:  P L Yee; K E Santoro; A L Grey; V Woog
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

3.  Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: attention to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it.

Authors:  P A MacDonald; S Joordens; K N Seergobin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

4.  Semantic priming in the prime task effect: evidence of automatic semantic processing of distractors.

Authors:  P Marí-Beffa; L J Fuentes; A Catena; G Houghton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

5.  Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.

Authors:  H Koshino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

6.  Priming and interference effects can be dissociated in the Stroop task: new evidence in favor of the automaticity of word recognition.

Authors:  Andrés Catena; Luis J Fuentes; Pío Tudela
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

7.  The effect of asymmetrical association on positive and negative semantic priming.

Authors:  Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

8.  The crucial roles of stimulus matching and stimulus identity in negative priming.

Authors:  Colin M MacLeod; Dan L Chiappe; Elaine F Fox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

9.  Response conflict reverses priming: a replication.

Authors:  W T Neill; T A Kahan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

10.  The adaptive character of the attentional system: statistical sensitivity in a target localization task.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Keith Weber; Jen Shang; Polina M Vanyukov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.