Literature DB >> 11495117

Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search.

H Koshino1.   

Abstract

Two visual search experiments were conducted to examine how activation of target-relevant features and inhibition of target-irrelevant features are involved in conjunction search. The hypothesis was that if an excitatory mechanism is involved, it should be revealed as facilitation when a target and distractors are repeated in two successive displays. If an inhibitory mechanism is involved, suppression should be obtained when distractor features from one display determine the target in the following display. The results of Experiment 1 showed that facilitation was observed consistently across two set sizes (5 and 9), whereas suppression was obtained only with larger set size (9). This pattern of results was replicated and extended in Experiment 2 with different set size. It seems that both excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms are involved in conjunction search. The excitatory mechanism seems to play a role in conjunction search regardless of search difficulty, whereas the inhibitory mechanism might play a role only when set size is larger.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495117     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Negative priming in same-different matching: further evidence for a central locus of inhibition.

Authors:  W T Neill; L S Lissner; J L Beck
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

2.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J C Brehaut; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Authors:  B Milliken; S Joordens; P M Merikle; A E Seiffert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.

Authors:  K Nakayama; G H Silverman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Mar 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects.

Authors:  S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

9.  Visual memory for novel shapes: implicit coding without attention.

Authors:  B DeSchepper; A Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset.

Authors:  S Friedman-Hill; J M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Harriet A Allen; Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-09

2.  Inter-trial priming does not affect attentional priority in asymmetric visual search.

Authors:  Liana Amunts; Amit Yashar; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-29

3.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.