Literature DB >> 20173136

Resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with locally advanced disease downstaged by preoperative therapy: a challenge for MDCT.

Desiree E Morgan1, Clinton N Waggoner, Cheri L Canon, Mark E Lockhart, Naomi S Fineberg, James A Posey, Selwyn M Vickers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer affects the ability of multiphasic MDCT to predict successful surgical resection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2006, there were 12 patients with prior neoadjuvant therapy successfully downstaged by CT and 31 age-matched pancreatic cancer patients without preoperative therapy who underwent pancreatic MDCT followed by attempted pancreaticoduodenectomy. Three readers blinded to surgical findings independently analyzed immediate preoperative MDCT scans of 43 patients comprising the retrospective data set in random order for vascular involvement (degree of contact and narrowing) and distant metastases. Individual reader sensitivity and specificity for resectability prediction were compared for study and control groups using the Fisher's exact test. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic.
RESULTS: Seven (58%) of 12 neoadjuvant-treated adenocarcinomas and 10 (32%) of 31 control pancreatic carcinomas were resectable (p > 0.05). For resectable disease, sensitivities were 86%, 71%, and 14% for the neoadjuvant group and 90%, 90%, and 60% for the control group (p > 0.05). Specificities were 80%, 100%, and 100% for the neoadjuvant group and 57%, 43%, and 76% for the control group (reader 2 specificity difference, p = 0.04). The multi rater kappa value of resectability prediction for neoadjuvant patients was 0.28, and that for control subjects was 0.63 (p < 0.001). In the neoadjuvant group, the majority of individual reader errors were false-negative resectability interpretations resulting from overestimation of vascular involvement. Consideration of degrees of venous abutment did not improve estimation of resectability in patients with neoadjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSION: Sensitivity for prediction of resectability tends to be lower for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer that has been downstaged by neoadjuvant therapy, but this trend is not statistically significant. Interobserver variability for determination of resectability is statistically higher than for controls who did not receive preoperative therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20173136      PMCID: PMC6309417          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

1.  CT evaluation after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mathilde Wagner; Celia Antunes; Daniel Pietrasz; Christophe Cassinotto; Magaly Zappa; Antonio Sa Cunha; Oliver Lucidarme; Jean-Baptiste Bachet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options.

Authors:  Jens Werner; Stephanie E Combs; Christoph Springfeld; Werner Hartwig; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Preoperative high level of D-dimers predicts unresectability of pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Adam Durczynski; Anna Kumor; Piotr Hogendorf; Dariusz Szymanski; Piotr Grzelak; Janusz Strzelczyk
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Surgery after FOLFIRINOX treatment for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: increase in tumour attenuation on CT correlates with R0 resection.

Authors:  Giovanni Marchegiani; Valentina Todaro; Enrico Boninsegna; Riccardo Negrelli; Binit Sureka; Debora Bonamini; Roberto Salvia; Riccardo Manfredi; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Use of imaging as staging and surgical planning for pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Hieu Nguyen; Laleh G Melstrom
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  [Resectability of pancreatic cancer: New criteria].

Authors:  J G D'Haese; J Werner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Resection of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer without Regression of Arterial Encasement After Modern-Era Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Michael D Kluger; M Farzan Rashid; Vilma L Rosario; Beth A Schrope; Jonathan A Steinman; Elizabeth M Hecht; John A Chabot
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jason Alan Pietryga; Desiree E Morgan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

9.  CT prediction of resectability and prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment using image findings and texture analysis.

Authors:  Bo Ram Kim; Jung Hoon Kim; Su Joa Ahn; Ijin Joo; Seo-Youn Choi; Sang Joon Park; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with resectable T3 pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hirotada Kittaka; Hidenori Takahashi; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Kunihito Gotoh; Terumasa Yamada; Yasuhiko Tomita; Yoshihisa Hasegawa; Masahiko Yano; Osamu Ishikawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.