J G D'Haese1, J Werner2. 1. Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Standort Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. 2. Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Standort Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Jens.Werner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is notoriously one of the most aggressive cancers and still has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only chance for a curative therapy approach, with which at least a 5‑year survival can be achieved for 25% of patients. Recent advances in surgical techniques have led to a change in the criteria for resectability. OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the currently available evidence on the criteria for resectability of pancreatic cancer and discusses the treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was based on a selective literature search and a summary of the latest data on criteria for resectability is given. RESULTS: Patients with pancreatic cancer must be differentiated into those with primarily resectable disease, borderline resectable disease, locally advanced (primarily unresectable) and metastatic disease. While infiltration into the major surrounding venous vessels (e.g. superior mesenteric vein, portal vein and confluence of splenic vein) used to be a criterion for unresectable disease, these tumors can nowadays be safely resected in specialized centers. Tumor infiltration into adjacent arteries (e.g. hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery) remains a clinical problem and surgical resection is often technically possible but associated with an increased morbidity and mortality and therefore not generally recommended. Borderline resectable tumors represent a special group for which neoadjuvant treatment concepts are increasingly being implemented. Radiological therapy response evaluation is challenging after neoadjuvant therapy as it is not usually associated with a radiologically detectable reduction in tumor volume. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resections can nowadays be more radically performed due to advances in surgical techniques. This has led to a change in the criteria for resectability, especially concerning venous tumor infiltration.
BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer is notoriously one of the most aggressive cancers and still has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only chance for a curative therapy approach, with which at least a 5‑year survival can be achieved for 25% of patients. Recent advances in surgical techniques have led to a change in the criteria for resectability. OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the currently available evidence on the criteria for resectability of pancreatic cancer and discusses the treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was based on a selective literature search and a summary of the latest data on criteria for resectability is given. RESULTS:Patients with pancreatic cancer must be differentiated into those with primarily resectable disease, borderline resectable disease, locally advanced (primarily unresectable) and metastatic disease. While infiltration into the major surrounding venous vessels (e.g. superior mesenteric vein, portal vein and confluence of splenic vein) used to be a criterion for unresectable disease, these tumors can nowadays be safely resected in specialized centers. Tumor infiltration into adjacent arteries (e.g. hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery) remains a clinical problem and surgical resection is often technically possible but associated with an increased morbidity and mortality and therefore not generally recommended. Borderline resectable tumors represent a special group for which neoadjuvant treatment concepts are increasingly being implemented. Radiological therapy response evaluation is challenging after neoadjuvant therapy as it is not usually associated with a radiologically detectable reduction in tumor volume. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resections can nowadays be more radically performed due to advances in surgical techniques. This has led to a change in the criteria for resectability, especially concerning venous tumor infiltration.
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Skye C Mayo; Hari Nathan; John L Cameron; Kelly Olino; Barish H Edil; Joseph M Herman; Kenzo Hirose; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Irene Esposito; Jörg Kleeff; Frank Bergmann; Caroline Reiser; Esther Herpel; Helmut Friess; Peter Schirmacher; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Giovanni Marchegiani; Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Vikram Deshpande; Erin I McDonnell; Francesco Sabbatino; Daniela Dias Santos; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Lipika Goyal; Eunice L Kwak; Janet E Murphy; David T Ting; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: John B Ammori; Lisa M Colletti; Mark M Zalupski; Frederic E Eckhauser; Joel K Greenson; Justin Dimick; Theodore S Lawrence; Cornelius J McGinn Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Andrew L Warshaw; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Vikram Deshpande; Theodore S Hong; Eunice L Kwak; Gregory Y Lauwers; David P Ryan; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: P Pessaux; E Rosso; F Panaro; E Marzano; E Oussoultzoglou; P Bachellier; D Jaeck Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.424