Literature DB >> 26993121

[Resectability of pancreatic cancer: New criteria].

J G D'Haese1, J Werner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is notoriously one of the most aggressive cancers and still has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only chance for a curative therapy approach, with which at least a 5‑year survival can be achieved for 25% of patients. Recent advances in surgical techniques have led to a change in the criteria for resectability.
OBJECTIVE: This review summarizes the currently available evidence on the criteria for resectability of pancreatic cancer and discusses the treatment options.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was based on a selective literature search and a summary of the latest data on criteria for resectability is given.
RESULTS: Patients with pancreatic cancer must be differentiated into those with primarily resectable disease, borderline resectable disease, locally advanced (primarily unresectable) and metastatic disease. While infiltration into the major surrounding venous vessels (e.g. superior mesenteric vein, portal vein and confluence of splenic vein) used to be a criterion for unresectable disease, these tumors can nowadays be safely resected in specialized centers. Tumor infiltration into adjacent arteries (e.g. hepatic artery, superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery) remains a clinical problem and surgical resection is often technically possible but associated with an increased morbidity and mortality and therefore not generally recommended. Borderline resectable tumors represent a special group for which neoadjuvant treatment concepts are increasingly being implemented. Radiological therapy response evaluation is challenging after neoadjuvant therapy as it is not usually associated with a radiologically detectable reduction in tumor volume.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resections can nowadays be more radically performed due to advances in surgical techniques. This has led to a change in the criteria for resectability, especially concerning venous tumor infiltration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borderline resectability; Radiology; Resectability criteria; Surgery; Tumor infiltration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26993121     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-016-0092-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  31 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Conditional survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resected with curative intent.

Authors:  Skye C Mayo; Hari Nathan; John L Cameron; Kelly Olino; Barish H Edil; Joseph M Herman; Kenzo Hirose; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The "artery first" approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Jürgen Weitz; Nuh Rahbari; Moritz Koch; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections.

Authors:  Irene Esposito; Jörg Kleeff; Frank Bergmann; Caroline Reiser; Esther Herpel; Helmut Friess; Peter Schirmacher; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Giovanni Marchegiani; Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Vikram Deshpande; Erin I McDonnell; Francesco Sabbatino; Daniela Dias Santos; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Lipika Goyal; Eunice L Kwak; Janet E Murphy; David T Ting; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Surgical resection following radiation therapy with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with previously unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  John B Ammori; Lisa M Colletti; Mark M Zalupski; Frederic E Eckhauser; Joel K Greenson; Justin Dimick; Theodore S Lawrence; Cornelius J McGinn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Yating Sun; Sandra L Wong; Therese A Stukel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a "true" R0 resection?

Authors:  Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Andrew L Warshaw; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Vikram Deshpande; Theodore S Hong; Eunice L Kwak; Gregory Y Lauwers; David P Ryan; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Preliminary experience with the hanging maneuver for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P Pessaux; E Rosso; F Panaro; E Marzano; E Oussoultzoglou; P Bachellier; D Jaeck
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  1 in total

1.  Incisional hernia in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  J Chen-Xu; R Bessa-Melo; L Graça; J Costa-Maia
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.739

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.